Supernova 2023ixf in M101
The new supernova SN 2023ixf, pictured here on May 21st, shines close to a prominent HII region, NGC 5461, in an outer spiral arm of the bright galaxy M101.
Eliot Herman

An enduring marvel of stargazing is knowing that photons have crossed vast distances of space to land on our retinas. It boggles the mind that light from the new supernova (SN 2023ixf) in the Pinwheel Galaxy (M101) has traveled nearly 21 million light-years to touch our eyes.

Looking through a telescope’s eyepiece connects me directly to such far-away wonders. It’s the realest form of magic I know.

But what about when visual astronomy isn’t possible? Sometimes it’s not just clouds that get in the way of stargazing.

As osteoarthritis erodes the cartilage in my knees, I can carry less and less equipment out the door even on the most brilliant nights. I have other limitations, too — like hair-trigger migraines — that complicate my hobby. It’s both frustrating and demoralizing to glance up at a clear night sky and know that I don’t have it in me to safely take the smallest telescope outside.

But we’ve come a long way since Hans Lippershey and Galileo Galilei. With continuing advances in technology, tools are available to overcome arthritic joints and other obstacles and allow more people to enjoy the nighttime wonders above our heads.

For me, the solution for seeing more with smaller and lighter-weight equipment is to go robotic: a Dwarf II telescope (nicknamed Persephone) has been added to my arsenal, and it has opened up the night sky to me in ways I hadn’t thought possible.

I didn’t embrace this technology right away. I enjoy the challenge of navigating to nebulae and asterisms on my own, so I can better learn my way around the sky. Even using my small GoTo scope sometimes feels like a cheat. But in a short space of time, even the 18-pound 127SLT became too much to manage. I needed a little astronomical help, so I took the plunge into electronically assisted astronomy.

Looking at a faraway star cluster on a tablet is a different experience than gazing through a telescope eyepiece or a pair of binoculars. For one, I’m looking down at a screen in my lap instead of up at the sky. It’s a little disorienting — but the awe of discovery is the same.

Under Bortle 6 conditions, I can image deep sky objects I never imagined I’d be able to see. These are nowhere close to Hubble-class images, but as I watch the Whale Galaxy (NGC 4631) and the Hockey Stick Galaxy (NGC 4656) stack on the iPad Mini screen, I feel like I’m literally holding the future of amateur astronomy in my hands.

On nights when I’m feeling my worst — and when I can benefit the most from stellar relief — I can carry my gear in one hand. All I need is Persephone’s little camera bag and my collapsible stool, plus a second trip to bring Jax’s dog bed outside.

I had a conversation about stargazing with a neighbor — begun when he misunderstood Jax’s involvement and thought the dog was looking up with me. (Jax doesn’t stargaze; he just snores.)

“I used to attach my DSLR camera to a telescope,” Ed said, then described imaging the Teapot in Sagittarius. “It was amazing, because you never knew exactly what you were going to get.

“But stacking images is not art. It’s computerization,” he added, grumbling about Photoshop and sleep deprivation.

He’s not wrong. EAA isn’t the same as seeing with your own eyes. I wish I could view everything through visual astronomy. I want to pretend I can feel the cosmic photons in my eyeballs. But my eyes aren’t built for peering that deep, nor do I have the physical stamina to lug giant mirrors to dark sky sites.

The good news is that astronomy doesn’t have to be difficult. While I’ve felt the satisfaction of hunting down an elusive deep-sky object with a Dobsonian telescope, diligence and hard work are only one path to wonder. Easier and more accessible avenues open the skies up wide for everyone, and I won’t deny joy.

I will always love unplugged stargazing, but I’m no longer as much of a cosmic photon-snob. By embracing tech, I get the best of both worlds. The other night, I set up the little robot scope to image the Golden Eye Cluster (M67) while I reclined in my zero-gravity chair to sweep the sky with my 7x35 binoculars — all from the comfort of my suburban backyard. With Jax snoring beside me, I am living an amateur astronomy miracle.


Comments


Image of Greg P

Greg P

June 5, 2023 at 10:00 pm

Thank you for posting this Jennifer. I always find your articles to be inspirational. I find myself in a similar situation where I don't use my old heavy scope, but have been hesitant to embrace the new technology, for fear of removing the pleasure of star hopping & direct eyepiece observation. But then I fall into an "all or nothing" trap. Your comment that "the awe of discovery is the same" is greatly appreciated.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 6, 2023 at 12:08 pm

Thanks for that, Greg. I thought about this purchase for more than year—while the Dwarf II was still in development—and was nervous about taking the plunge. EAA is completely new to me, and I am definitely still learning (and making lots of mistakes). But last night, I saw M5 (Rose Cluster) for the first time and imaged M104 (Sombrero Galaxy), all from my suburban front yard. Looking at a screen instead of through an eyepiece is different, yes, but I feel the same thrill and deep wonder.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

June 7, 2023 at 7:49 pm

Thank you Jennifer. I've been very impressed with the views of galaxies and nebulas through EV scopes at star parties. But I don't feel the need to buy a dedicated imaging scope. I'll keep looking at what I can see with my eyes, binoculars, and little telescope, knowing that there's a whole universe hidden from view. I love looking at other people's astrophotographs, without needing to make my own.

How is looking at a nearly real-time image of an object through an automated imaging telescope that you set up and turned on yourself different than looking at another image of the same object created some time ago by a highly skilled astrophotographer? This is a sincere question.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 9, 2023 at 4:12 pm

That's a question I asked myself, several times, while considering the Dwarf II. Why not just look at (much better) photos from experienced others, or from the big space telescopes? But every time I sit outside with this little EAA robotic scope, I feel that same, real-time stargazing thrill as the image stacks on the screen. Maybe this is because I feel like a participant, rather than a spectator?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

June 9, 2023 at 5:23 pm

Thanks Jen. I can see the attraction. I'm going to continue to freeload, appreciating other people's work, at least for now.
My own backyard skywatching is getting simpler and more modest. Especially when the weather is partly cloudy or my neighbors' lights are on, I might just appreciate the big-picture naked-eye view of how the brightest stars have moved toward the west in the past few weeks, or how a bright planet has moved relative to the stars. That can be enough to give me that "I'm on a planet, orbiting a star, in a galaxy ..." feeling.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 15, 2023 at 4:23 pm

That's a good feeling. 🙂

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Oyvind

Oyvind

June 9, 2023 at 5:47 pm

Thank you, Jennifer, for this article.
Such a good reminder that even though we are not all accessing large telescopes, we are free to find ways of enjoying the night skies and wonders, in whatever way is to our liking.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 15, 2023 at 4:28 pm

Exactly—thanks! 🙂

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of donbrabston

donbrabston

June 10, 2023 at 2:09 pm

Thank you, Jen, for an inspirational article. I am an aging (77 years old) retired aerospace engineer with MS which severly limits my movement. Living in the suburbs outside of Los Angeles with its astronomically-unfriendly skies, but with a lifelong love of astronomy and all things space, I'd largely given up doing any observational astronomy until I saw your article. (I have a variety of telescopes left over from previous decades of observing. They range from a Mead 8" Newtonian down to a pair of 10X50 binoculars, having disposed of my childhood 40X Gilbert and 6" Criteron Dynascope telescopes over the years of moving from place to place.) Now I'm interested in looking into the Dwarf II to rekindle my love of astronomy. After finding an interesting video about the Dwarf II - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKWVpp83sWg - I hope to learn more and will probably purchase a Dwarf II. Thanks for getting me going again. I had no idea the world of robotic astronomy had progressed so far.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Greg P

Greg P

June 10, 2023 at 6:39 pm

Don - It's interesting that you had the 6" Criterion Dynascope; my dad had the same one when I was growing up. Seems like it was such an easy scope to deal with; we left the heavy mount outside (though the weather eventually necessitated us getting the motor repaired), and the tube was incredibly light, so it was quite easy for me to use on my own as a kid.

I hope that whether it's the Dwarf II or something else, you and I both find new scopes which let us rekindle our observing.

Jen - Were there any other similar systems which you had considered before deciding on the Dwarf II? I found the idea of the Unistellar eVscope interesting, as it actually has an eyepiece (mentioned in the writeup about Tim Russ in https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-resources/famous-astronomers/tim-russ-actor-director-amateur-astronomer/).

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 15, 2023 at 4:23 pm

Greg: There are a few other options on the market with considerably larger apertures—and with much bigger price tags to match. For me, the Dwarf II was the best fit. I'm hoping that the entry-level and beginner-friendly Dwarf II and the forthcoming ZWO Seestar S50 will prove that there's a market for these smaller EAA offerings, and that maybe we'll see more competition and advancement in the next few years.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Jen Willis

Jen Willis

June 15, 2023 at 4:28 pm

Thanks, Don! While my article wasn't intended as a product review, I'm encouraged that my experience might open up a new stargazing chapter for you. I've been reading about another entry-level EAA robot scope, ZWO's Seestar S50, that's in development—or maybe already available? I've been impressed by how my D2 handles light pollution here in Metro Portland, and I know conditions are even worse in LA.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Mark-Grosz

Mark-Grosz

August 6, 2023 at 11:41 pm

Hi Jen, I’ve been using a AstroTech AT72EDII on a SkyWatcher AZGti mount, along with an ASIAIR+ and an ASI533MC Pro to do EAA both at home and at night sky outreaches. I can move the rig with one hand and little kids can see the views on my tablet easier than through the scope. Recently discovered I can screen mirror the views to an old appletv and attached monitor at outreaches where I can get to power.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.