Deep Space Industries, Inc, announced plans to send a fleet of asteroid-prospecting to target asteroids in 2015 — and that’s just the first step in their ambitious proposal.

When Planetary Resources announced their plans to mine asteroids last April, there were plenty of naysayers — just take a gander at the commenters responding to our article at the time! But following the announcement, billionaire investors hopped on board. And now another entrepreneurial company is heating up the competition.

Deep Space Industries, Inc, announced its asteroid-prospecting plans yesterday at a press conference in Santa Monica's Museum of Flying. Most of the company's long list of founders were present, including Chairman of the Board Rick Tumlinson and CEO David Gump, veterans of space commercialization. Though the press conference was short on details, such as what investors they have lined up and what propulsion system they'll use, the company did reveal an ambitious plan for asteroid mining.

The Plan

FireFly, asteroid-prospecting spacecraft

The first step in mining asteroids is to learn more about them. DSI aims to launch a fleet of FireFlies in 2015 to prospect promising near-Earth asteroids, determining properties such as their composition and spin rate.

Deep Space Industries

Deep Space’s grand plan comes in three parts. The first stage is the FireFly fleet (a name sure to warm the heart of any Joss Whedon fan), three spacecraft scheduled for launch in 2015. These 25-kg (55-lb), laptop-sized probes will carry imaging equipment to examine the composition, spin rate, and other properties of promising near-Earth asteroids. To take advantage of their small size, the FireFlies will utilize technology developed for CubeSats, mini-satellites (no more than 1.3 kg) designed to piggyback on the launch of commercial satellites.

The FireFlies' scheduled launch date has garnered some skepticism. “CubeSats are a good idea [but] I think 2015 is unrealistic,” says S&T contributing editor Jonathan McDowell (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), who tracks rocket launches. “Maybe 2017 or 2018 for a first launch.”

DragonFly captures asteroid

The DragonFly is scheduled to follow the FireFly in 2016, setting out on longer, roundtrip expeditions to bring back 60-150 pounds of asteroid for further study.

Deep Space Industries

The FireFlies will be designed for a quick one-way trip, taking maybe 6 months to reach their target asteroid. Their successor, the DragonFly, will make roundtrips, taking 2-4 years to return samples from near-Earth asteroids. Deep Space’s press release claims these 70-lb spacecraft will be able to carry home 60 to 150 lbs worth of asteroid. That’s quite a hefty sample, compared to the roughly 2 kg that OSIRIS-Rex, NASA’s asteroid sample-return mission, aims to collect.

The aggressive schedule puts the first DragonFly launch in 2016. (That success might herald the company’s IPO, suggests David Gump, the company’s CEO.) But returning hundreds of pounds of asteroid is only the beginning. The DragonFly will be succeeded by the Harvestor, a true asteroid-mining spacecraft that will require a major launch vehicle to make it into space and will return thousands of tons of space-rock per year, starting as early as 2020.

Asteroid harvesting

The Harvestor will herald the age of asteroid-mining. These spacecraft will return thousands of tons per year for space-based manufacturing and refueling of aging satellites.

Deep Space Industries

A key point of Deep Space’s master plan is that the material they mine won’t go back to Earth. At most, it’ll go to low-Earth orbit, where volatiles will be used to refuel aging communication satellites, and rare metals can be used in space-based manufacturing. Material is expensive to launch into space (about $10,000 per kg), so a typical asteroid worth $4,000 on Earth’s surface would be worth $1 million in orbit, estimates Mark Sonter, a member of Deep Space’s board of directors.

The ideas Deep Space Industries presents aren’t new. The idea of asteroid mining has been around at least since the 1940s, thanks to science fiction, and fiction began merging into fact as early as this 1979 NASA study. NASA has been doing its own share of asteroid exploration lately with the Dawn mission, and the upcoming OSIRIS-REx. And then there’s the ongoing watch for potentially hazardous near-Earth objects. The privately funded B612 Foundation will launch the Sentinel spacecraft in 2017 or 2018, with the aim of mapping out the inner solar system.

But the real competition is Planetary Resources. As hal9000 said in Spacevidcast’s live chat during the press conference, “May they be the Coke and Pepsi of asteroid mining.” The two companies are plotting similar trajectories — find asteroids worth going to, rendezvous, and eventually, send in the mining robots — albeit with different technologies. So far, Planetary Resources has some notable advantages: a several-month lead, several billionaire investors, and a working prototype. (Their tech update was uploaded to YouTube two days before DSI’s big announcement.)

Who’s the Sherriff of Outer Space?

So if two companies are vying for the same, lucrative goal, who regulates the competition?

“We are relying on the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which gives us the right to utilize space resources,” David Gump said at the press conference. Specifically, the Outer Space Treaty, opened for signature in the U.S., the U.K. and the Russian Federation on January 27, 1967, says, “outer space shall be free for exploration and use by all States,” but it also says, “outer space is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty.” In other words, governments can’t own or apply its national laws to an asteroid, but individual companies can visit one, mine it, and bring material back to Earth, no problem.

(Read the treaty at the website of United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs.)

The problem, said space law professor Frans von der Dunk (University of Nebraska) in an interview with Bloomberg Law, is that private corporations are usually licensed by governments, and government licenses generally only apply to government-owned territory. So since no country can own an asteroid, no country’s laws can ever apply.

Gump points to the oft-cited parallel of deep-sea mining in international waters. “That went forward without a global treaty. The companies that wanted to do deep-sea mining basically shook hands and said, we won’t interfere with you if you don’t interfere with us.”

“Like outer space, the seabed is a global commons. The key difference is that we do have a quite elaborate law of the sea regime,” explains von der Dunk. “A company operating with a license under those conditions can rest assured that its entitlement to whatever’s going to be mined will be respected in a legal context, and that’s precisely what’s missing so far in outer space.”

As asteroid mining becomes a reality, politicians and regulators will be faced with developing regulations defining licensing and liability in space.

But Gump doesn’t appear worried about the legal aspects. He plans to build on what has already been legally established, encouraging Congress to write laws to implement the 1967 treaty.

“There are 2 or 3 million near-Earth asteroids,” Gump says. “There’s room for everyone to prosper.”


Image of Peter


January 23, 2013 at 11:38 am

Good for the billionaire backers, who could probably make more money in oil and gas.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Tony Flanders

Tony Flanders

January 24, 2013 at 6:18 am

I'll believe it when I see it. Asteroid mining is less farfetched than other ideas such as space colonies. However, space enthusiasts have a habit of underestimating costs by two or three magnitudes. Witness the Space Station, which was supposed to make flight to low Earth orbit cheap and routine. The aspect of this venture that involves the most hand-waving is refining the materials in orbit. Nothing remotely like that has ever been done before. And no, billionaires aren't immune to self-delusion. Quite the contrary.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of tom hoffelder

tom hoffelder

January 24, 2013 at 8:43 am

But obviously money is not the limiting factor here. Maybe "A fool and his money are soon parted" would be more appropriate?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bruce Mayfield

Bruce Mayfield

January 24, 2013 at 12:06 pm

Yes, there are many "aging communication satellites", but I wonder how many, if any, of today's satellites are equipped for in orbit refueling?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Roger


January 25, 2013 at 10:43 pm

Much like the U.S. airline industry is regulated by the older Railway Labor Act, the U.N. or handshakes could use terrestrial sea law precedents to apply to space operations.

I think that eventually space mining will happen. When it does, operators will need guidelines.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of kingsley


January 26, 2013 at 2:18 am

low earth orbit will be there base. How about destroying space environment thereby causing more climate change on earth?!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of M Carter

M Carter

January 27, 2013 at 8:58 am

So SAD for the Billionaire backers!
Mining on Earth can be a loss making Gamble, Even oil prospecting!
Apart from the occasional discovery of Red or Green Kryptonite,
Stray Antimatter or Phlogistine, I doubt that much of value will be found.
Still, There are Huge quantities of Graphite, so pencils may be cheaper, also Diamonds so we all may wear Huge, beautiful Gems, pity the Diamond Cartells!
We could even mine Methane from Titan or Jupiter, sorry about Global Warming, someone will make a fortune, but but not these Turkeys!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Richard Carroll

Richard Carroll

January 28, 2013 at 12:32 am

Is any thought being given to collecting scientific data, beyond assays of desirable minerals? Overall history of the asteroids will likely lead to searches which are better targeted to utilizing extraterrestrial resources.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

January 28, 2013 at 2:18 pm

There are a few thousand people on this planet who literally have more money than they know what to do with, while billions suffer from hunger and poverty and die of preventable diseases. Asteroid mining enterprises are like tulips in 17th century Holland or 10-million-dollar paintings today. These schemes are not a serious business investment, they're an efficient way for obscenely wealthy people to dispose of surplus money while promoting themselves (at least in their own minds) as forward-thinking problem-solvers. I'm all in favor of robotic space exploration, and some interesting and useful information and technology may come of these efforts, but I don't believe we're ever going to see commercially viable asteroid mining.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of M Carter

M Carter

February 5, 2013 at 7:36 am

Was that Forrest Gump maybe? MC

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.