Back in 2006, astronomers used the Hubble Space Telescope to watch vast numbers of stars in the Milky Way's central bulge to look for gravitational lensing by extrasolar planets. The observations revealed 16 Jupiter-sized planetary candidates and also, as a byproduct, identified 42 oddly bright blue stars within the bulge. Astronomers think that many or most of these are “blue stragglers”: old stars that, for reasons uncertain, burn as hot and bright as if they were part of a young stellar population. Bulge stars are supposed to be very old.
Blue stragglers have intrigued astronomers since 1953, when Allan Sandage discovered them among the ancient stars of the globular cluster M3. Stars that form at the same time, such as in a cluster, should evolve together. But blue stragglers look rejuvenated — long after their equally massive peers have evolved into red giants or on to white-dwarfhood. In the standard explanation, a blue straggler has acquired a great deal of fresh mass from another star, perhaps by a collision and merger, and as a result is now fusing hydrogen at the fast pace of a younger star.
The star merger could be the result of a direct collision or, perhaps more likely, the result of a close miss that results in a close binary that eventually spirals together. Only where stars are stars are much closer together than in our own vicinity is this ever likely to happen.
The galaxy's central bulge is indeed dense toward its center, as are globular clusters. And in a population of old stars, such young-looking ones stand out. At a press briefing earlier this month at the American Astronomical Society’s Boston meeting, Will Clarkson, the Indiana University investigator who led the study, said that only 3.4% of the galactic bulge’s stars formed in the last five billion years.
While these reborn stars are commonly seen in globular clusters, this is the first time they’ve been spotted within the bulge itself. “Every new environment we can find these blue stragglers in is good,” said Clarkson. He and other experts believe that these oddballs have much to reveal about the formation and evolution of stars generally.
But Clarkson noted that isolating them in the galactic bulge was tricky. Hubble peered at this distant region through a haze of foreground stars of all ages. The team had to filter these out to get a clean sample of bulge stars. They used the different speeds at which these two star populations orbit the galactic center to make this distinction.
“Stars that are closer [to us] seem to orbit faster,” said Clarkson. He compared it to looking from Boston at cars driving in Los Angeles. “Cars in a city in Kansas will be in the way. But they will pass by faster against the background of Los Angeles, and you can use this speed to separate the two.”
In this way the team isolated 12,762 bulge stars. At least 18 to 37 of them are suspected to be blue stragglers. To confirm this, scientists will look for signs of lithium, carbon and oxygen depletion — chemical signatures of mass transfer. Clarkson said that a blue straggler’s spin period could also indicate if it evolved from a merged binary pair.
Clarkson’s team, however, did not use their data to estimate the total number of blue stragglers in the entire galactic bulge. “What we saw is only a pencil beam,” Clarkson said: a sample along one narrow line of sight. “We did not want to use this to make a prediction for a larger population of stars.” So the bulge's exact makeup is still not known with complete precision.