Glass beads in samples from China’s Chang’e 5 mission show that volcanic eruptions occurred on the Moon within the past 120 million years or so.

Change 5
An artist's illustration shows China's Chang'e 5 mission lifting off from the Moon.
CNSA

The Moon rocks returned by Apollo astronauts gave us our first hands-on evidence of lunar volcanism, showing it to be ancient — dating back to at least 3.1 billion years ago. Yet there have been claims of more recent activity, based on orbital sensing and ground-based imaging, and now new evidence suggests those claims may have been on the right track: The Moon might have had active volcanoes up until relatively recently.

In 2020, the Chinese Chang’e 5 mission returned lunar samples for the first time since the Apollo and Soviet missions of the 1970s. Initial studies showed evidence of volcanic activity as recently as 2 billion years ago. Now, analysis of tiny glass beads in those samples show that active volcanism persisted on the Moon much longer than that. In fact, they point to volcanism occurring just 123 million (give or take 15 million) years ago, the researchers report in the September 5th Science. In geological terms, that’s almost into the present day.

“We’re going from 2 billion years being the youngest samples that we have in hand, to now materials that are less than a tenth of that age,” says John Delano (State University of New York, Albany), who spent much of his career analyzing the Apollo lunar samples. “That’s a dramatic change in age.”

Because of his expertise with the Apollo samples Delano was recruited by the Chinese team, led by Bi-Wen Wang and Qian Zhang (both at Chinese Academy of Sciences). As their U.S. collaborator, he helped analyze vast amounts of data collected from 3,000 glass beads recovered from the Chang’e 5 samples of lunar regolith.

In the years since the samples came back, Delano says, the Chinese team has “done this real backbreaking, clever, highly skilled work,” which included mounting, polishing, and analyzing each bead with a variety of state-of-the-art instruments. He then helped the team use chemical, physical, and isotopic data to home in on 13 interesting beads that show signs of originating in volcanic processes rather than impacts. The Chinese team then “went to town” on those 13, Delano says, narrowing them down to three that contained evidence of surprisingly recent volcanism.  

Glass bead origin scenarios
Meteorite impacts and volcanic eruption producing glass beads on the Moon.
T. Zhang & Y. Wang

“The sulfur isotopes really were the clincher,” Delano says. Different isotopes of a given element contain different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei and respond slightly differently to extreme heating events, whether such an event is a volcanic eruption or a meteor impact. As material melts and vaporizes, lighter isotopes more readily float away from the Moon’s low gravity, leaving more of the heavier isotopes behind.

When vaporized material resolidifies, the ratios of isotopes of different elements can help trace its heating history. While both impacts and volcanic eruptions can produce extreme heating, impacts heat material intensely and rapidly, while volcanism heats material more slowly. Impact heating thus tends to result in more of the heavier isotopes, and volcanism produces material with a more even balance of light and heavy isotopes. The latter is what the team found in three of the glass beads. Meanwhile, other isotopic ratios in the same sample provide a reliable estimate of its age.

“The confidence is now high,” Delano says, that these three beads really are signs of relatively recent volcanic activity.

Previous Hints of Present-Day Volcanism

Although there hasn’t been hard evidence before, there have previously been a number of suggestions of recent volcanism based on indirect methods. For example, orbital imagery of the surface suggested volcanism might have occurred in some regions as recently as 50 to 100 million years ago, according to a study by Sarah Braden (Arizona State University) and others in 2014. And visual observations of potential volcanic activity, dubbed transient lunar phenomena (TLP), have been reported for centuries, going as far back as Christiaan Huygens in the 1600s — some have even seen apparent plumes of dust. But whether any of these lines of evidence really reflected recent volcanism remained controversial.

In fact, the Chang’e 5 samples were collected “only a couple of hundred miles from some of the most active TLP areas,” Delano says. “That may be a coincidence, but maybe it isn’t.” Indeed, Chang’e 5 grabbed samples from a surface known to be younger than those sampled during the Apollo missions.

Rectified version of the Chang'e 5 panorama
This is a rectified version of the landing site panorama taken by cameras aboard Chang'e 5.
CNSA / CLEP / Don Davis

These findings of recent volcanism “suggest there’s a level of activity in the moon that is beyond what current modeling is assuming,” he says. Geophysicists will need to adjust their ideas to account for this, he says.

The Moon: Geologically Alive?

Benjamin Weiss (MIT), a specialist in the formation and evolution of planetary bodies who was not involved in this latest work, says that the evidence presented here is largely statistical. That is, the team combed through thousands of variations of elemental and isotopic compositions to find some whose ratios differed enough from the others to be statistically significant. The finding of three glass beads with such differences would be strengthened by finding additional samples with similar compositions. In fact, the methods used to analyze these glass beads could now be applied to the much more abundant Apollo samples as well, Delano suggests.

“If it’s true, then it’s a really interesting discovery,” Weiss adds. “This would be by far the youngest volcanic melts produced by interior processes on the Moon. It would suggest that the Moon has been volcanically active essentially yesterday.”

The new findings are “part of this growing awareness that maybe the Moon had this longer and more protracted history of geologic activity,” he says.

“The paradigm that we often view the Moon as is this kind of window into the early stages of planetary formation and evolution,” Weiss notes. “So, it’s interesting to consider the idea that this thing that seems like a dead body is continuing to be active.” Because of their continuing sampling of previously unexplored parts of the lunar surface, he says, “the Chinese sample return missions are in the process of sort of revolutionizing our understanding of the recent history of the Moon.”

Comments


Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

September 16, 2024 at 8:08 pm

Has this research been published? What is the p value of this statistical conclusion? I don't know much about geology, but I can imagine three tiny glass beads formed by impacts with anomalously little variation in their sulfur isotopes. I would be interested to read what is found by applying these same methods to Apollo and Luna samples.

I'll bet we could learn more from plenty of relatively inexpensive robotic sample return missions than waiting for one long-delayed, brief human Moon mission.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Monica Young

Monica Young

September 18, 2024 at 11:11 am

Hi Anthony, Yes, the research has been published in Science, and I've just added the link to the article: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adk6635/. There's no p-value given, though, the conclusion is based on the ratios of certain elements' isotopes. But I see your point — three of 3,000 is a low enough number to suggest that they might simply be statistical outliers. I'm with you on being excited to see this applied to other samples we have on hand!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

September 18, 2024 at 7:19 pm

Thank you!

The perspective by Yuri Amelin and Qing-Zhu Yin is interesting and intelligible to this layperson. They raise what seems to me the biggest question if these ~120-million-year-old tiny glass beads really are volcanic:

"Detailed modeling is needed to fully evaluate whether the estimated heat generated within the Moon is adequate to maintain local magma activities until 120 Ma."

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adr9336

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.