Observations of one of the most powerful supernovas ever recorded suggest that the standard model for gamma-ray bursts might be missing a piece of the puzzle.

Gamma-ray Burst

Black Hole Birth Cry
The GRB 130427A was first detected by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor aboard the Fermi spacecraft. The initial burst of gamma rays herald the collapse of a star into a black hole. Click image for larger view.

NASA / DOE / Fermi LAT Collaboration

In the early-morning hours of April 27th, a burst of high-energy photons set off an alarm on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope. The photons came from a star that exploded 3.75 billion years ago in spectacular fashion, sending out a brilliant flash of radiation known as a gamma-ray burst.

The star’s demise wasn’t just any supernova. The gamma-ray burst GRB 130427A turned out to be the longest, most energetic such explosion on record.

Within four minutes of the alarm, the Swift spacecraft had swung its three telescopes to monitor the explosion with Fermi. An array of robotic telescopes (Rapid Telescopes for Optical Response, or RAPTOR), the CARMA millimeter-wave observatory, and the NuSTAR X-ray telescope also joined in on the action. In the end, the explosion flooded 58 observatories worldwide (on the ground and in space) with its photons.

In this week’s Science, four international collaborations dissect this data treasure-trove to find out what made the monster tick. And it turns out the observations show astronomers are missing a piece of the GRB puzzle.

The Burst That Kept On Giving

Light curve of GRB 130427A

GRB 130427A's Evolution
The evolution of GRB 130427A follows a similar pattern, decreasing steadily over time, regardless of wavelength. That universal pattern suggests one mechanism might be responsible for all the different photons observed from this gamma-ray burst. (Click image for larger view.)


These days, GRBs are common observations, appearing at a rate of about one per day, but GRB 130427A was a rare occurrence. Not only was this burst extremely powerful, it also happened to be nearby. Combined, its brightness and location made it easy for telescopes to collect heaping piles of data.

And the burst just kept on giving. Although the main burst lasted just 20 seconds (typical for this kind of “long” GRB), stray gamma rays kept pouring in for another 20 hours, long after the main burst had finished — and much longer than any other such burst.

But of all the thousands of gamma-ray photons Fermi collected during that time, it only took two to steal the spotlight. The first appeared 19 seconds after the burst began; the next appeared 3¾ minutes later. And these photons packed a serious punch: 73 and 95 billion electron volts, the highest-energy photons ever recorded from a GRB.

There’s just one problem: according to the current model used to explain GRBs, these photons shouldn’t have existed.

Another Piece to the Fireball Puzzle?

Gamma-ray burst and afterglow

The Standard GRB Model
The usual picture for GRBs has the initial gamma rays coming from colliding shells of gas within the jet. The afterglow, produced minutes or hours later, arises from the jet smashing into the cocoon of hot gas surrounding the star. (Click image for larger view.)


In the standard picture, “long” GRBs like 130427A (which last on average about 30 seconds), herald the collapse of very massive stars. As the star’s core implodes to form a black hole, gas just outside that boundary feeds a jet that burns its way through the star’s outer layers. Collisions within the jet produce a brilliant burst of emission, which we’ll see if we happen to be looking down the jet’s nozzle.

It takes only seconds for the jet to escape the star, but even then it’s not free. It rams into the surrounding gas cocoon left behind by the dead star’s winds, pushing electrons to nearly the speed of light. As the ultra-speedy particles race around magnetic field lines, they release their pent-up energy as radiation: the burst’s afterglow. This synchrotron radiation explains a lot of the emission we see from GRBs, including everything from gamma rays and X-rays to visible light.

This animation shows how the standard GRB model works:

For the most part, this model works pretty well to explain GRB 130427A. But those two high-energy photons pose a problem. No matter how fast they spiral, electrons can’t radiate away 95 billion (or 73 billion, for that matter) electron volts of energy.

So what if electrons perform double-duty? Alessandro Maselli (INAF-IASF Palermo, Italy), lead author of one of the Science papers, suggests that the same electrons that created the photons in the first place could pass on an extra punch of energy if they later collide with their progeny.

But one study’s coauthor, Charles Dermer (Naval Research Laboratory), says if there are two ways to make photons, we should see a jump in the number created at different energies (say, many more gamma rays than X-rays). Instead, the whole spectrum from visible light to ultra-high-energy gamma rays is smooth, suggesting all the photons come from one mechanism.

The Science papers aren’t lacking for alternative explanations for making these gamma-ray photons: the teams propose everything from snapping magnetic field lines to scorching-hot gas around the forming black hole. The synchrotron model hasn’t been ruled out either, though it’s clear that something extra is needed. But so far, none of the suggestions are testable — yet.

Fermi Collaboration. “Fermi-LAT Observations of the Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 130427A.” Science, 2013 November 21. Full paper.

A. Maselli et al. "GRB 130427A: A Nearby Ordinary Monster." Science, 2013 November 21. Full paper.

R. Preece et al. "The First Pulse of the Extremely Bright GRB 130427A: A Test Lab for Synchrotron Shocks." Science, 2013 November 21. Full paper.

W. T. Vestrand et al. "The Bright Optical Flash and Afterglow from the Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 130427A." Science, 2013 November 21. Full paper.


Image of Gregg Weber

Gregg Weber

November 22, 2013 at 3:56 pm

Could some gravitational lensing be a reason for such a long duration like a light pulse from one source arrives differently when passing through glass of differing densities, properties?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Peter Wilson

Peter Wilson

November 23, 2013 at 7:08 am

On a tempest of radiation? Claimed possible for decades by Russian scientists, but dismissed by Western academia as vodka-induced fantasy? Can we at last say that rogue photons are a real phenomenon of nature?
Gregg, good question. Believe gravitational lensing would only change the brightness, not the duration. In any case, what they‘ve diagrammed is the simplest explanation for the light-curves, and simplest is usually best.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of John-Hockemeier


April 10, 2014 at 7:46 pm

The article on GRB 130427A reports on photons of billions of eV energy levels, "the highest ever recorded for GRBs." At the Whipple Observatory's VERITAS project, gamma rays of TeV energies have been recorded. Could their gamma-ray sources be other than GRBs?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.