A new nova for early risers plus three fun observing projects for the week ahead.

V7993 Sgr finder map
The nova is located between the Teapot's "Spout" and the bright open cluster M7 in Scorpius. I include a suggested star-hopping route, starting at the 2nd magnitude star Epsilon (ε) Sagittarii. Once you've arrived at the asterism (circled), use the chart below to pinpoint the nova's location. North is up.
Stellarium with additions by Bob King

We have a new "star" in the night sky. In truth, it's been there for billions of years, but it only first revealed itself a little more than a week ago. Nova Sagittarii 2025 no. 3 was independently discovered on March 23–24 by the Russian New Milky Way (NMW) Survey and Japanese amateur Tadashi Kojima at a right ascension of 18h 02′ and declination of –33° 11′. Both parties caught the star around magnitude 13; two days later it had brightened to 10.5. Despite its southerly declination, the nova stands more than 10° above the horizon before the start of dawn, making it an attainable target even for observers in the northern U.S.

V7993 Sgr AAVSO map
It's a quick hop to the nova from the circled asterism. Take a close look at the star's color — many novae glow red from hydrogen emission during the early phase of the explosion. V7993 Sgr has also been reported to have a red color. Decimals are omitted in the comparison star magnitudes. For example, 106 equals magnitude 10.6.
Courtesy of the AAVSO

Clouds have thwarted my attempts to see it, but most estimates posted to the AAVSO peg it at magnitude 10.7 on April 1st. Not long after its discovery, the star received the official designation V7993 Sagittarii, making it the 7,993rd variable star to be discovered in Sagittarius. Although novae can appear anywhere in the sky, they're far more common within the star-dense band of the Milky Way, and especially in Sagittarius where we face toward the galactic center. In fact, this is the third nova discovered so far this year in the constellation.

This animation depicts an outburst of the recurrent nova T CrB but also demonstrates the nova eruption process. Watch until the end for the exciting conclusion.
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab

In last week's post, I described novae, recurrent novae, and dwarf novae. All three types occur in close binary star systems, in which one member is a hot, dense white dwarf and the other a normal star. In each case, material flows from the companion into a flattened cloud of hot gas called an accretion disk, which spins around the dwarf. In a nova, material funnels down from the disk to the star's surface until sufficient mass has accumulated for heat and pressure to ignite the gas in a runaway thermonuclear explosion. The blast creates a brilliant fireball, which slowly cools and fades. A recent measurement clocked V7993's expanding debris cloud at 700 kilometers a second (1.6 million mph). Despite the blast, the white dwarf remains intact after the blast, and the process begins anew.

Novae generally skyrocket in brightness quickly, then gradually fade over the following weeks and months. Watching a nova dim (and occasionally re-brighten!) makes them great long-term observing subjects. Use the AAVSO map and comparison stars to help you follow V7993 Sgr's variations.

Demon Star in eclipse

Algol-type eclipsing binary animation
Algol is a binary star consisting of a B8 main sequence star (blue) and a larger, cooler K0 subgiant. Every 2.9 days, the subgiant eclipses the hotter star. A minor, secondary dip in the system's light occurs when the B star passes in front of the subgiant. The red-black dot tracks the light variations.
Merikanto, CC BY-SA 4.0

As a budding 11-year-old amateur astronomer, my first variable star was Algol in Perseus. I still remind myself to gaze its direction every clear night I'm out from fall through spring. Every 2.9 days the more massive but fainter star in this binary system eclipses the smaller, brighter companion. In full eclipse at minimum light, Algol shines weakly at magnitude 3.4 compared to its usual 2.1. The difference is very apparent with the naked eye.

If you've read about Algol and have never observed it (or it's been a while), you'll have the opportunity to see it in eclipse on the night of April 3rd. At 10:11 p.m. EDT that evening, the star will dim to minimum light. For one hour on either side of minimum, it remains near that brightness. But if you check 2 hours or more after minimum, you'll see it begin to recover in brightness.

Algol finder map
Use the comparison stars, labeled with magnitudes, to track changes in the variable's light as it rises from or falls to minimum.
Stellarium with additions by Bob King

Despite eclipses occurring at short intervals, they're visible only infrequently for any particular location. After the April 3rd event, the next widely and easily visible eclipse takes place on April 26th. For more eclipse times and additional information, visit Sky & Telescope's Minima of Algol calculator.

One night, two moons, three events

Jupiter has already begun its western descent. When a planet reaches a high declination, it seems to stick around forever, even taken for granted. But the writing's on the wall — the gas giant's good nights are dwindling. It's time for another look.

On the night of April 5–6, three separate events involving two Jovian moons occur in succession. First, observers in the eastern half of the U.S. and Canada will see Europa cast its tiny black shadow on Jupiter's cloud tops from 6:16 to 8:54 p.m. CDT. While the first part of the shadow transit won't be visible due to Sun and/or twilight interference, we'll see Europa's shadow skirting the south edge of the Southern Equatorial Belt (SEB) in a darkening sky.

Jupiter moon phenomena
Each panel depicts an event that occurs on April 5-6, starting with a Europa shadow transit, followed by the reappearance of Ganymede after occultation and its eclipse a couple hours later. North is up.
Stellarium

Starting at 9:22 p.m. CDT, Ganymede will emerge from occultation at the planet's northeastern limb, looking like a tiny pearl. A little more than two hours later, at 11:30 p.m., the same moon will slowly fade from sight as it enters Jupiter's shadow in eclipse. It won't poke back into the sunlight again until 2:04 a.m. To find out times of other watch-worthy Jovian moon events, visit Sky & Telescope's Jupiter's Moons site.

Uranus occults 9th-magnitude star

Uranus occults HIP 16271
This simulated shows Uranus a few minutes before occulting the star HIP 16271 around 9:30 p.m. CDT on April 7th for observers in central North America. The particular location is Chicago at 9:23 p.m. local time. The planet will cover the star for about 28 minutes. North is at upper right.
Stellarium

On the evening of April 7th, Uranus will occult the 9.1 magnitude star HIP 16271 around 9:30 p.m. CDT (2:30 UT). Observers in central North America will have the best view. Farther east, the planet will be too close to the horizon or have set, while in the western U.S., the occultation takes place in a bright sky. Even from the best locations, it will still be challenging because the planet will be only about 15° high at the time.

Serious amateurs will attempt to record dips in the star's light as it's occulted by the planet's spindly rings prior to and after its disappearance behind the planet. More casual observers can watch Uranus slowly encroach on the star until the two merge into one. For full details, including a list of cities and times, check out occultation expert David Dunham's Uranus Occultation page.

About Bob King

I love the sky (day and night) and have been a skywatcher and amateur astronomer since childhood. I'm also a long-time member of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) and Astronomical League. I pen the Astro Bob blog and have written four books: Night Sky with the Naked Eye (2016); Wonders of the Night Sky You Must See Before You Die (2018) and Urban Legends from Space (2019) and Magnificent Aurora, published in 2024. The universe invites us on an adventure every single night. To accept the invitation, we only need look up.

Comments


Image of misha17

misha17

April 2, 2025 at 5:17 pm

Re: Eclipses of Algol -
"At 10:11 p.m. EDT that evening (April 3rd), the star will dim to minimum light. For one hour on either side of minimum, it remains near that brightness. But if you check 2 hours or more after minimum, you'll see it begin to recover in brightness."

The light graph in the video shows two sharp dips/"valleys" during the eclipses. Given the minimum is 2 hours long for the April 3rd event, the drops in brightness during minima should be flat troughs, not sharp dips.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bob King

Bob King

April 2, 2025 at 6:55 pm

Hi Misha,
Thank you for your comment. Look up Algol light curves, and you'll see most show the same sharp profile due to scale. The animation used in the article isn't a precision light curve
but intended for illustration purposes.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of John

John

April 3, 2025 at 12:43 pm

I think the article would be unharmed if you dropped the final paragraph, with its pointless distinction between "serious" and "casual" amateurs. Gave me flashbacks to my beginnings in the hobby in the early 1980s. There were two very good periodicals, Sky & Telescope and Astronomy. Most enthusiasts at the time would describe Sky & Telescope as the one for "serious amateurs," while the other magazine was for the "more casual observer." Indeed, reading Sky & Telescope in those years was like sitting in a classroom at the Catholic school, where you were always made to feel guilty, and you feared getting backhanded by the nun, for not being a serious enough student. Meanwhile, reading Astronomy magazine was like taking a class field trip to the Smithsonian.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bob King

Bob King

April 3, 2025 at 3:26 pm

Hi John,

Great comment and story. And your point is well-taken. I only used "serious" to distinguish those amateurs with a lot of equipment and determination who might try to record occultations by the planet's dim rings. That's definitely an undertaking. "Casual" refers to many others — including myself — who who make lack equipment or the desire to undertake such a project but who would nonetheless enjoy watching the planet approach the star. Perhaps "advanced amateurs" would have been a better fit?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of davidrogersbooks

davidrogersbooks

April 5, 2025 at 1:05 pm

I wonder who else noticed the sentence that says Algol is an amateur astronomer: "As a budding 11-year-old amateur astronomer, Algol in Perseus was . . ."

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bob King

Bob King

April 6, 2025 at 12:59 pm

David,
Ha! A chuckle-worthy ambiguity. Thank you!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.