Lenses, electronics, and many other parts of the telescopes used in amateur astronomy are made in Asia.

Sean Walker / Sky & Telescope
The historic tariffs levied against China by the Trump administration are already affecting companies and consumers throughout the United States. They also threaten the small, passionate industry of amateur astronomy gear.
At the 35th Northeast Astronomy Forum (NEAF) earlier this month, tariff conversations permeated the world’s largest astronomy exposition. That’s because astronomy products are particularly vulnerable to tariffs, due a reliance on Chinese manufacturing for glass, electronics, and numerous other telescope parts. From boutique manufacturers to large telescope distributors, companies are weighing how to respond to Trump’s tariff policy — and how the astronomy industry might fare as a result.
Tariffs have become “all we talk about,” says Franck Marchis, Chief Science Officer at Unistellar. But “the problem we have is not really the tariffs, it’s the uncertainty that it’s bringing.”
On February 1st, the Trump administration announced 10% tariffs against China, raising them to 20% in an announcement on February 27th. In response to China’s retaliatory tariffs, the Trump administrated reported on April 2nd that its tariffs would rise again to 54%; on April7th, they rose to 104%; and on April 9th, the sum reached 145%. China’s total tariffs against the U.S. stand at 125%. The fluctuations have made it difficult for companies to determine if they should accelerate manufacturing, raise prices, cancel orders, or just wait it out.
“Things are changing on a daily, if not hourly basis, so there’s no way to come up with any kind of cohesive strategy,” says Jeff Simon, director of Sky-Watcher North America. “It’s like trying to work out a dance routine on quicksand.”
Some companies, like Sky-Watcher, have frozen further shipments from China while they wait for stability. Others, like Celestron, have also placed existing orders on hold. Ben Hauck, Celestron’s senior vice president of sales for North America, estimates that the company has held up $10 to $15 million worth of product (in terms of cost, not retail pricing) since the tariffs took effect.

Sean Walker / Sky & Telescope
“It’s really hard to come to a complete halt, because then when you start back up, it takes months to get inventory flowing again,” Hauck says. But so far, he feels that pausing orders is preferable to increasing prices. The tariffs have “really forced our hand,” he says.
To keep their retailers informed, Hauck has sent out two internal letters detailing Celestron’s plans. The most recent letter, sent on April 23rd, announced that some existing orders will be filled if the product was subject to tariff rates from 10 to 30% when initially shipped from China, with Celestron absorbing the cost increase.
One of the Trump administration’s stated tariff goals is to increase American manufacturing. However, even astronomy companies that do rely on American labor and factories are feeling the squeeze.
Karen Christen, business administrator for Astro-Physics, says the tariffs are still an issue for the small, high-end telescope and mount company based in Illinois. “Is the company more insulated? Yes,” she says. “Entirely insulated? By no means.” While Astro-Physics conducts nearly all of their manufacturing and assembly in the U.S., they import their electronics from Asia, since virtually none are made in America. The company is preparing to order another electronics shipment, which makes Christen worried that the tariffs will hurt the family-run business.
“We monitor the news every day, trying to get some idea of what’s going on,” says Vic Maris, President of Stellarvue, an American manufacturer of refractors based in California. Due to the tariffs, they’ve had to halt shipments of specialty optical glass made in China. While Stellarvue has six months to a year’s supply stocked up, the glass takes four months to manufacture, meaning that future orders will face waitlists even when (or if) tariffs resolve. And new product designs that contain such glass cannot move forward, Maris says.

Sean Walker / Sky & Telescope
Meanwhile, customers are buying up telescopes faster than usual in an attempt to beat tariff pricing, accelerating how soon companies might need to re-order materials from abroad. Even outside of the U.S., “everybody is freaking out” and deciding whether to buy telescopes sooner rather than later, says Marchis, whose company is based in France.
At the end of the day, tariffs will most impact consumers looking to enter into amateur astronomy in the lower price range, around a couple hundred dollars. That’s not least because the U.S.-based manufacturers produce equipment at the higher end of the market, compared to Celestron and Sky-Watcher, says Christen.
While a wealthy amateur might stomach an increase from $5,000 to $7,000, for example, “a lot of working-class families can't afford to buy a telescope that goes up by 20% or 30% or 40%,” says Hauck, noting that the 145% tariffs could even push more than a doubling of costs. “The idea that some families and some kids won’t have the ability to experience the wonders of the nighttime sky…because of high prices [and] policies from this administration is deeply depressing.”
About Hannah Richter
Hannah Richter is a freelance Earth, space, and science policy journalist based in Washington, D.C. In addition to Sky&Telescope, her work has appeared in Science, Nature, Scientific American, Popular Mechanics, Smithsonian, WIRED, Science News, Ars Technica, and Sierra, among others. She has also written an e-book for NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and is an alumna of MIT's Graduate Program in Science Writing.
10

Comments
Enrico the Great
April 25, 2025 at 9:02 pm
This would come up sooner or later. Shifting production of astronomical equipment overseas was always a risk. but until now it was also a blessing, bringing us low priced but advanced instruments. However---until the early 2000s the attitude of the PRC towards the USA was friendlier than it is now. With the rise to power of President Xi, that equation has changed. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea have put away their differences, and have formed a coalition of convenience in order to balance against and confront the United States. Add the trade issues and intellectual property and fentanyl and Taiwan this was a perfect storm waiting to happen. Meanwhile the U.S. based manufacturers are almost (or all?) gone. Be nice if at least some basic equipment was still made here. (Those Dynascopes would be a-ok right about now---but do we even make a Dobsonian here?) Then here is the moral issue. The electronics, digital sensors and optics we import from the PRC are first cousins to military gear---perhaps we are funding (or were funding) a miniscule part of a now unfriendly nation's military R&D. Perhaps for the good of us amateur astronomers. let us hope that if our instruments cannot be made in this country, President Trump gets a deal with Taiwan or other friendly state involving low or no tariffs---and us hope the PRC does not invade it. Otherwise, we will have to wait for the Russia - China rivalry to assert itself again resulting in political changes in the world correlation of forces for any improvement in the situation.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
matthewota
April 26, 2025 at 9:57 am
If the tariffs get too high, it will force telescope manufacturers to do all of their production domestically. It will create jobs. But this process would take a long time, and in the meantime amateur astronomers that are less well heeled will be better off buying used equipment. As for the wealthy amateur astronomers, they have no problems at all paying the higher prices.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
chrisgbedford
April 28, 2025 at 9:53 pm
>If the tariffs get too high, it will force telescope manufacturers to do all of their production domestically. It will create jobs.
Or they will conclude that there isn't sufficient market at the new price points to support a business, shut down their operations, and go do something else to earn a living.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Enrico the Great
April 29, 2025 at 12:27 pm
Then we go back to Amateur Telescope Making. The rest of us will be screwed----but I suspect we WILL go back to domestic production. We should be able to make a relatively inexpensive Dobsonian at least of say 10–12-inch aperture domestically? Coulter did back in the 1980s. Or an updated equatorial Newtonian?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Michael-Finkelstein
April 30, 2025 at 10:23 am
How will they be able to do that and compete against Asian companies where the workers making those products earn 1/4 of what domestic workers do? Shifting back to domestic production is a nice goal to have, but it won't happen unless American workers are willing to have their wages cut which means it's not gonna happen. The current administration will soon realize the Chinese have all the bullets in this fight.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Enrico the Great
April 30, 2025 at 12:30 pm
The relevant questions---aside from issues of wages, are: How many potential U.S. workers have the relevant skills? Of those how many would be willing to come out of retirement and take on their old profession, or at least pass on their knowledge, experience and skills to new workers? Does the grinding and other machinery still even exist? Is there a niche for a small, specialized business to be established? WOULD WE ACTUALLT BUY THEIR PRODUCTS? Tough questions---with no easy or pat answers. As far as the PRC having "all the bullets", that all depends. The PRC has its own internal problems, and if outsourcing is a must---there ARE other nations out there. India has begun making eyepieces--and I am sure they can do more than that. But----never underestimate the power of entrepreneurship---perhaps someone out there is formulating a novel business model for a domestic producer of astronomical equipment. Issues of wages and cost are not new ones, and Meade was producing domestically well into the 1990s if I am remembering correctly---and Parkes survived long enough to have a faitly well designed and complete. website. Admittedly not my area of expertise, but I do suspect that given the right approach someone may make a go of it. I hope.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
thekobokid
April 26, 2025 at 3:06 pm
I'm based in the UK so this doesn't bother me but...
I've just bought a pair of Celestron binoculars and was very surprised to see on the box that it proudly stated MADE IN CHINA!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Enrico the Great
April 29, 2025 at 12:20 pm
My understanding is that Celestron has a deign office in California, but that their products are made by Synta, a PRC company. When strill in business, Meade had a similar arrangement.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Enrico the Great
April 29, 2025 at 12:29 pm
So----any possible domestic manufacturers of any type of scope and other equipment out there? If any of you know, let the rest of us know---can't think of what to Google on this.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Enrico the Great
April 30, 2025 at 12:35 pm
Had forgotten about Astro-Physics. . Hope they do well.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.