New data has allowed a team of researchers to reconstruct a detailed view of a famous circle in the constellation Lyra.

Ring Nebula at different wavelengths
The Ring Nebula as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope (left), the Submillimeter Array (center), and the James Webb Space Telescope (right).
University of Manchester

Astronomers have constructed the clearest 3D view yet of the famous Ring Nebula, the gaseous remains the dying embers of a Sun-like star. Despite the circular shape, the nebula isn’t a sphere. Instead, the new work reveals that it’s an ellipsoid, shaped like a rugby ball thanks to the interaction of a binary system at its center. We only see it as round because we are looking down one of the nebula’s poles.

The Ring Nebula (also known as Messier  57) is a cosmic tombstone in the constellation Lyra, marking the life of a star much like the Sun. When that star reached the end of life, it ballooned in size before shedding its outer layers into space, like a snake dispensing with its skin. In a few billion years, a similar fate awaits our Sun. Traditionally, astronomers have tried to map remnants like the Ring Nebula using instruments such as the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes. These instruments are sensitive to hot gas and dust within the nebulae.

Now, a team led by Joel Kastner (Rochester Institute of Technology) have pioneered a different approach. The team used the Submillimeter Array (SMA) in Hawai‘i to peer at the carbon monoxide (CO) molecules hidden with the nebula. The CO is cold and tends to envelop the hotter material that was previously observed.

“The SMA allows us to accurately measure the velocities of the molecular gas in the nebula, so we can see what's moving toward or away from us,” Kastner says. The CO map thus allowed Kastner and his team to build a more detailed 3D interpretation of the Ring Nebula's structure than what has been constructed previously.

This video walks through imaging of the Ring Nebula using various telescopes and the detailed 3D model derived from those data.
RIT Imaging Science

From this structure came some key insights. Firstly, the team could estimate the nebula’s age, suggesting it is a mere 6,000 years old — an astronomical infant.

Secondly, the astronomers spotted blobs of gas emerging at around 50 kilometers per second (more than 100,000 mph) from each end of the ellipsoidal shell. This fast-moving material flows outward through holes that are almost aligned with the spin axis of the original star — but not quite. The outflow is tilted with respect to the spin axis by about 10°. That misalignment suggests the gravitational influence of one or more companion stars.

The finding dovetails nicely with previous work on Webb observations, in which astronomers also put the nebula’s concentric rings down to the influence of a companion.

“I think this is a very nice study that settles some previous debates as to the actual 3D structure of the Ring Nebula,” says Roger Wesson (Cardiff University, UK), who was not involved in the research. “Determining the 3D structure of the nebula constrains its evolutionary history in a way that images alone cannot.”

In particular, Wesson says, the evidence for a binary companion “shows again that binarity plays a crucial role in the formation and evolution of many or even most planetary nebulae.”

Understanding planetary nebulae tells us not only about the Sun’s ultimate fate but also about how we came to be here. “The stars that generate planetary nebulae like the Ring . . . may have produced much of the carbon in the universe,” Kastner says. We are carbon-based lifeforms, after all. “We can watch that carbon on its way to being recycled into the next generation of stars and planets when we observe these amazing objects.”

About Colin Stuart

Colin Stuart (@colinstuartspace) is an astronomy author and tutor. He also runs a free online astronomy club.

Comments


Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

February 5, 2025 at 12:50 am

I'm curious why this is news? This ESA Hubble link "The geometry and structure of the Ring Nebula (Messier 57)" almost says exactly the same thing. [1] It is dated 23 May 2013! References stating this morphology going back to 2000. I.e. Kwok, Sun " What Is the Real Shape of the Ring Nebula?", S&T., 100, 1 pg.32 [July] (2000)
It's hardly 'brand new'! Roger Wesson saying: "I think this is a very nice study that settles some previous debates as to the actual 3D structure of the Ring Nebula,..."; seems to me bamboozling and likely quite wrong. Yes,the observations made here to support the contention of the morphological structure of the Ring Nebula, but there are other proofs supporting this decades earlier. As far as I know, the variations on the true morphological structure are frankly minor in difference.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Monica Young

Monica Young

February 6, 2025 at 9:58 am

Hi Andrew, thanks for you comment. The story also points to previous research (from 1999, no less!) that paints a similar picture. The point with adding the SMA data is that it offers new details that Hubble and JWST weren't able to see. From the article: "The CO map thus allowed Kastner and his team to build a more detailed 3D interpretation of the Ring Nebula's structure than what has been constructed previously."

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of joel.kastner

joel.kastner

February 9, 2025 at 11:10 pm

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for pointing this out. You and S&T's readers may want to read our paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12223; ApJ, in press), as we discussed and compared the various proposed models for the Ring's intrinsic structure (e.g., Bachiller+1989, Bryce+1994, Guerrero+1997, O'Dell+2007, O'Dell+2013, Wesson+2024) in some detail. Whether one characterizes the differences between these models as significant or not really depends on what one is trying to learn; even seemingly minor differences can be important if they can help (say) discriminate between different flavors of interacting binary system progenitors for the Ring. And I certainly wouldn't claim that our results are necessarily the last word on the subject, but I would say that the 3D view that we've now obtained from the SMA CO mapping was certainly eye-opening to me and the coauthors on our paper. I hope you (and S&T's readers) had a chance to watch the movie that S&T kindly embedded in this article, so you can enjoy the SMA's 3D imaging of the Ring as well... 😉

As for my statement that, in observing planetary nebulae, we can watch carbon being 'recycled': well, I was trying to be cautious in my wording, but I have to admit, I can't help being enthusiastic about the wide variety of insights that can be gained by observing planetary nebulae. They are simply amazing astronomical objects, with so much to teach us about the stellar life cycle, the fates of binary star systems, the origin of the elements in the Universe, ionization and shock processes, molecular chemistry...on and on.

Thanks for your comments and your interest in this subject,
Joel Kastner

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

February 5, 2025 at 1:11 am

Saying: "Understanding planetary nebulae tells us not only about the Sun’s ultimate fate but also about how we came to be here. “The stars that generate planetary nebulae like the Ring . . . may have produced much of the carbon in the universe,” Kastner says. We are carbon-based lifeforms, after all. “We can watch that carbon on its way to being recycled into the next generation of stars and planets when we observe these amazing objects.”

Sorry, the statements are over said. The truth is the carbon is mostly put into interstellar space mainly by AGB stars, then add positive there by superwinds. Most of the carbon is thrown out well before the planetary nebulae phase which only last a few tens of thousands of years. e.g. One of the greatest carbon polluters are the R CrB variable stars, none of which produce a fluorescing shell but infrared dust. Interestingly, these are thought to be caused by the merging of two white dwarf stars, where the upheaval by convection stirs up the insides of the two stars, produces prodigious amounts of carbon that orbits these stars.

Moreover, the central stars are planetary nebula have progenitors that are between one and eight solar masses. These produce a variety of white dwarfs with different compositions. Most have helium cores, but only the upper mass white dwarfs have sufficient carbon or oxygen. Only the heaviest progenitors are able to produce sufficient amounts of carbon to be released to interstellar space. Whilst measuring CO emissions is important in many planetaries, this does not mean the carbon is necessarily universal to all of their kind.

I understand wanting to dumb down information for novices, but it's really important to project the truth that carbon is one of the means in which it is distributed into interstellar space. So yes, I do agree with much of this story, I think there is a slight distortion in what's being said.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.