Gamma-ray bursts are the most luminous explosions in the universe, and we’ve learned much about these superlative outbursts since their discovery in 1967.

An X-ray image of GRB 221009A
An X-ray image of GRB 221009A's emission scattering off of dust.
Adapted from Williams et al. 2023

new Focus Issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters released yesterday showcases results related to the gamma-ray burst GRB 221009A: the brightest of all time. Today’s post briefly introduces the Focus Issue articles that have already been published or are in press — be sure to check out the full articles linked below, and keep an eye out for future articles in this issue!

A Superlative Burst

An infrared image of the afterglow of GRB 221009A
An infrared image of the afterglow of GRB 221009A (circled), taken 1–2 months after the onset of the burst. The burst’s host galaxy is the faint, extended source behind the burst.
NASA / ESA / CSA / STScI / A. Levan (Radboud University); Image Processing: Gladys Kober

Gamma-ray bursts are brief flashes of high-energy emission, lasting anywhere from a fraction of a second to several hours. The shortest gamma-ray bursts likely mark the collision of two compact stellar remnants called neutron stars, and the longest bursts are thought to arise when a massive, rapidly spinning star collapses to form a black hole. After the initial burst of gamma-rays, dubbed the “prompt” emission, a sustained afterglow shines for days or weeks at radio to X-ray wavelengths.

On 9 October 2022, a remarkable new gamma-ray burst named GRB 221009A was picked up by 25 satellites, most of which weren’t designed to detect gamma-ray bursts — like Voyager 1 and a pair of Mars orbiters. The burst even made an impact on Earth’s atmosphere, creating a disturbance as large as a solar flare would. To put that into context, this means that an explosion roughly 2 billion light-years away had as large an effect on our atmosphere as a solar flare more than 100 trillion times closer!

GRB 221009A Across the Electromagnetic Spectrum

An article led by Maia Williams (Pennsylvania State University) describes the initial discovery and the properties of this extremely bright, long-lived burst. GRB 221009A’s X-ray afterglow is more than an order of magnitude brighter than other gamma-ray bursts observed by the Swift Observatory, and analysis of its emission suggests that the jet it produced is extremely narrow. However, the authors found that GRB 221009A’s afterglow emission isn’t fit well by some of our standard models for how the emission is produced — namely, a jet of energetic particles interacting with material surrounding the object — suggesting that further work is needed to understand the event.

Radio, optical, and X-ray observations of GRB 221009A at different times
Radio, optical, and X-ray observations of GRB 221009A at different times, with the observation day indicated by the symbol color. The solid lines indicate the results of a shock emission model. The model fails to capture the observed radio flux.
Laskar et al. 2023

After its initial discovery at high energies, astronomers monitored GRB 221009A at wavelengths across the electromagnetic spectrum, aiming to understand the nature of the event and pin down its unusual properties. Tanmoy Laskar (University of Utah) and collaborators inspected GRB 221009A’s behavior from radio to gamma rays, finding evidence for a shock forming where the gamma-ray burst’s jet collides with surrounding material. The team noted that the radio emission should linger for years more, providing further opportunities to study this event.

In addition to space-based gamma-ray telescopes, researchers used a ground-based gamma-ray observatory to study the event. Luckily for life on Earth, most gamma rays fail to reach our planet’s surface, but we can detect the faint light emitted when gamma rays interact with particles in the atmosphere. Researchers used the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) — a set of five telescopes located in Namibia — to search for emission linked to GRB 221009A, but found none. Despite this, the upper limits derived from the observations allowed the HESS team to constrain the possible emission mechanism for the burst.

David Kann (Goethe University Frankfurt) and collaborators presented optical and X-ray data spanning from the prompt phase of the burst out to 60 days post-burst. The team used these observations to study the dust along the path between the burst and Earth, finding that the burst’s host galaxy is probably moderately dusty. Modeling of the burst’s jet presented some curiosities: the simplest jet model failed to reproduce the observations, and adding structure and other features to the jet didn’t improve the fit.

Supernova or No?

In addition to the prompt and afterglow emission, gamma-ray bursts are often accompanied by a supernova, powered by nuclear reactions within the material expelled as the star collapses. As the emission from the burst fades, emission from the supernova brightens, eventually peeking out from beneath the fading afterglow as a bump in the light curve days or weeks after the onset of the burst. One of the many intriguing features of GRB 221009A’s evolution is that it might not show any supernova emission.

Optical and near-infrared light curves for GRB 221009A.
Optical and near-infrared light curves for GRB 221009A.
Shrestha et al. 2023

Manisha Shrestha (University of Arizona) and collaborators examined GRB 221009A’s light curves and spectra for signs of a supernova, but didn’t find a convincing supernova signal in either. The team’s modeling suggested that a supernova could be hidden beneath the bright afterglow, though, depending on how much the host galaxy’s dust stifles the light from the supernova. Michael Fulton (Queen’s University Belfast) and coauthors monitored the burst at optical wavelengths as it faded over the course of nearly two months, finding a potential but inconclusive supernova bump around 20 days after the burst.

Andrew Levan (Radboud University) and collaborators turned two exceptional telescopes toward the burst — JWST and the Hubble Space Telescope — and obtained the first mid-infrared spectrum ever taken of a gamma-ray burst. These observations suggest that if there is a supernova accompanying the burst, it’s faint or its spectrum peaks at wavelengths bluer than those covered by JWST and Hubble. Future work will help to disentangle the emission from the gamma-ray burst afterglow, the possible accompanying supernova, and the gamma-ray burst host galaxy that is visible in the Hubble images. If this burst occurred sans supernova, it might mean that the newly formed black hole swallowed the debris of the exploded star, or it could mean — though the team deems this unlikely — that GRB 221009A was instead caused by the merger of neutron stars.

Polarization, Particles, and Dusty Pathways

A team led by Michela Negro (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) observed the burst with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer, obtaining the first measurement of polarized X-rays from a gamma-ray burst afterglow. The observations revealed a bright central core of emission surrounded by rings created by photons scattering off of dust grains. In other words, the team was able to study the prompt emission (in echo form) and the afterglow simultaneously! The team placed an upper limit on the polarization fraction of 13.8% for the afterglow emission and somewhere between 55% and 82% for the prompt emission.

Electron flux
Electron flux measured by one of the three detectors making up the High-Energy Particle Package (black) and the scaled photon count from the High Energy Burst Searcher (blue).
Battison et al. 2023

High-energy radiation from a gamma-ray burst can produce a significant increase in the ionization of Earth’s upper atmosphere. Some of these newly formed ions can be detected by spacecraft, yielding another way to study gamma-ray bursts as they happen. Robert Battison (University of Trento) and collaborators presented data from the High-Energy Particle Package on the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite, which shows a sudden increase in the flux of charged particles at the time of the gamma-ray burst.

The IceCube Collaboration also searched for particles associated with the burst, but neutrinos — chargeless, nearly massless particles produced in a variety of high-energy astronomical phenomena — proved elusive. The link between neutrinos and gamma-ray bursts is theorized but yet to be proven, and the team detected no neutrinos from the event. Planned upgrades to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory might allow us to detect neutrinos, if present, from future gamma-ray bursts.

To reach us on Earth, emission from GRB 221009A had to carve a path through the Milky Way. As the narrow beam of emission pierced our galaxy, it illuminated dust clouds along its path like the beam of a flashlight. Because of this, researchers observed shifting rings of X-ray emission for weeks after the event, showing where X-rays had scattered off of dust clouds within the Milky Way. Andrea Tiengo (IUSS – School for Advanced Studies and National Institute of Astrophysics, Italy) and collaborators reported the detection of 20 such rings, corresponding to echoes off dust clouds located 1,000–61,000 light-years from Earth.

Images of the expanding rings at 0.7–4 kiloelectronvolts.
Images of the expanding rings at 0.7–4 kiloelectronvolts.
Tiengo et al. 2023

Brightest of All Time… So Far

Since its discovery, GRB 221009A has been referred to as the BOAT — the Brightest Of All Time. In the final Focus Issue article published yesterday, Eric Burns (Louisiana State University) and collaborators explored whether that moniker is truly deserved. By comparing against decades of gamma-ray burst observations, the team found that GRB 221009A indeed had by far the highest peak flux of any gamma-ray burst measured to date, and it topped the list for two out of the remaining three measures of brightness. Looking more closely at the properties of events observed over the past 50 years, the team estimated that GRB 221009A is a once-in-ten-millennia event. So while GRB 221009A is certainly not the brightest gamma-ray burst in the history and future of the universe, it’s probably the brightest burst in the history of human civilization — and its rarity means we’re lucky it happened while we have working gamma-ray telescopes!

Over the past few months, GRB 221009A has been hidden from view, blocked by the Sun’s disk. Soon, though, its reemergence will give researchers the chance to study it further and hopefully solve some of the lingering mysteries about its evolution.


In addition to the Focus Issue articles published yesterday and those still to come, you can watch a recording of the GRB 221009A press conference presented yesterday at the 20th meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division.


Articles belonging to the Focus Issue will be collected here: Focus on the Ultra-luminous GRB 221009A

This post originally appeared on AAS Nova, which features research highlights from the journals of the American Astronomical Society.


Image of goodricke1


March 31, 2023 at 4:24 pm

The naming convention for these events is somewhat irritating - "221009". As a European I find myself asking 'is that the tenth of September or ninth of October', and I'm not sure why such an international effort should fall in line with the US system anyway. If we are to follow Western calendar customs, then "9Oct22" would be more sensible all round.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Martian-Bachelor


March 31, 2023 at 8:32 pm

Much more helpful than a "name" based on a date would be the other standard naming convention, based on the object's celestial coordinates: RA 19h-13m-03.5s, Dec +19°46′24.6″ -- hence Swift J1913.1+1946 . BTW - z=0.151 .

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Karl


March 31, 2023 at 11:31 pm

The naming convention yymmdd has nothing to do with 'the US system'. It is used so the events fall into chronological sequence.

The popular US convention is mm-dd-yy.
The popular European convention is dd-mm-yy.
Neither would be a sensible way to number events. Using them would randomize the sequence.

"9Oct22" is even worse because you've dropped the leading zero and introduced random alphabetical characters.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of ToomasKarmo


April 1, 2023 at 12:35 pm

Yes, correct: the naming convention yymmdd is used to make alphanumeric sort sequence (as in, for instance, computer programming work) match the chronological sequence. The yymmdd convention is a truncation of the yyyymmddThhmmssZ convention recommended at ISO for UTC time-stamping by year (in four digits), month, day, hour, minute, and second: .

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Yaron Sheffer

Yaron Sheffer

April 2, 2023 at 7:00 am

Now that we've settled the time issue, let's talk about space. Second caption says "The burst’s host galaxy is the faint, extended source behind the burst." So which is it? Is it a hosting galaxy at the same distance of the GRB, or is it lurking in the background, hiding from the bright light "in front" of it?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.