Astronomers have discovered a planet in the habitable zone of the closest star to the Sun.
The closest star to our solar system is currently Proxima Centauri. Proxima is a small, red M dwarf only about half as hot as the Sun and 14% as wide. It’s member C of the Alpha Centauri system, a triple-star system that lies just over 4 light-years away.
And now, astronomers say, they’re sure Proxima Centauri has a planet.
The world, Guillem Anglada-Escudé (Queen Mary University of London) and colleagues report August 24th in Nature, has a mass at least 1.3 times that of Earth, meaning it’s potentially rocky. It orbits the star every 11.2 days at a distance of only 0.05 times the Earth-Sun distance, or roughly one-tenth the space between Mercury and the Sun. That places it right in the star’s putative habitable zone.
We’ve had our hopes raised for alien worlds in the Alpha Centauri system before. For example, in 2012 observers reported that they’d found what looked like an Earth-mass planet hugging the orange Sun-like star Alpha Centauri B. But follow-up work by other researchers raised a red flag. The putative planet has since proved to be a subtle “ghost” in the data, created by how the original team sliced up the observations for analysis.
But the new exoplanet, dubbed Proxima Centauri b, appears to stand on more solid ground. Astronomers had suspected for some time that Proxima had a planet: data from two European Southern Observatory (ESO) spectrographs had found a shift in the star’s light that seemed to repeat every 11.2 days. This shift might have come from a tiny wobble in the star’s position toward and away from us, due to the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet.
But being an M dwarf, Proxima is a fairly active star. Astronomers didn’t have enough data to tell if the signal was instead just muck in the starlight from flares and other stellar hubbub.
So Anglada-Escudé’s team started the Pale Red Dot campaign to find out if the planet was real. The campaign had a two-pronged approach. First, the team convinced ESO to let them use the renowned HARPS spectrograph on La Silla’s 3.6-meter telescope in Chile to observe Proxima Centauri for 20 minutes every clear night from January 19th to March 31st this year. Second, a network of other telescopes simultaneously watched for changes in the star’s brightness, pinpointing the star’s rotation period and recording if any flares went off. This work is called photometry.
The team found that the new, 2016 HARPS data also contained a periodic signal, just like the one in the archival data. And when the researchers combined both sets of data into one and analyzed the whole, 16-year-spanning shebang, the statistical significance (read: “how believable the signal is”) went “sky high,” Anglada-Escudé said in a press conference. There’s no doubt that it’s real.
But the real kicker is the photometry. Proxima itself didn’t do anything during the observations that could explain the periodic signal. Instead, the best solution is a planet.
M Dwarfs: They’re Everywhere
The existence of Proxima Centauri b is far more likely than the now-disproven Alpha Cen Bb, for three reasons, says exoplanet researcher Debra Fischer (Yale). One, the signal is stronger: the world causes a wobble of about 1.4 m/s, safely above the observations’ 1 m/s error range. Two, the Pale Red Dot campaign’s merciless every-night attack proves the signal repeats the way it had seemed to.
And three, the math is better: astronomers overall are improving their statistical toolkit, and this new analysis holds more water. In fact, if you take a gander at the paper, you’ll see that in many ways it’s a stats paper — discussions of “Bayesian framework,” “likelihood function,” and so forth are prominent.
“I’m very excited about this planet, but not terribly surprised,” says David Charbonneau (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), who heads up the MEarth Project to look for exoplanets around M dwarfs. A few years ago, he and Courtney Dressing (now at Caltech) used Kepler data to estimate that one out of every four M dwarf stars has a planet that’s at most 1.5 times as wide as Earth. Expand the size to twice that of Earth, and the rate goes up to nearly one out of every two. “With those odds, it isn’t at all that surprising that the closest M dwarf has one,” he explains.
But we don’t know how big Proxima Cen b is. Astronomers’ favorite way of measuring a planet’s radius is watching it cross in front of its star from our perspective: how much light the exoplanet blocks depends on its size. But MEarth and other projects have failed to detect a transit. That’s to be expected, Charbonneau says: geometrically speaking, there’s only a 1.5% chance that the world passes across the face of Proxima.
That means the newly discovered planet is probably no target for NASA’s upcoming Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), says mission team member Sara Seager (MIT). However, in the grand scheme of things the discovery is good news for TESS, she adds, because it “buoys our confidence that TESS will find a bonanza of planets transiting nearby M dwarf stars.”
Although it sure looks like Proxima Cen b is real, astronomers always want more data. The best way to follow up may be taking actual pictures. The star is so close that upcoming adaptive optics instruments will be able to directly image the planet — assuming they can properly block out the star’s light to see the world, which is only 35 milliarcseconds (about 1⁄100,000°) away from it. They may also be able to tease out reflected light from any atmosphere, revealing its composition.
In addition, there’s the upcoming ESPRESSO spectrograph on VLT, which will go online in 2017. With it, says Fischer, “demonstrating the existence of Proxima Cen b should be like shooting fish in a barrel.”
A Habitable Planet Around Proxima Centauri?
Whether Proxima Cen b actually is habitable remains a wide-open question. Technically it lies at the right distance from its star that, if it has the right composition and atmosphere, it would be the right temperature to sustain liquid water on its surface.
But, the authors stress, astronomers only know three things about this world: its mass, orbital period, and distance from the star. It’s not even clear whether Proxima Cen b is rocky — the 1.3 Earth masses is a lower limit; the team can’t give an explicit, upper cutoff for how hefty it might be. Still, coauthor Ansgar Reiners (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany) says previous work has shown that massive planets generally don’t form around stars this small. His gut instinct is that the world probably doesn’t weigh more than a few Earths. That could still make it a mini-Neptune.
If the planet does have a surface, whether it has water will depend on how it formed and what happened to it soon after — did it coalesce far away from the star, where ices reign, and then migrate in, carrying that water with it? Did it form from dry rocks and so never picked up any water? We don’t know. Artie Hatzes (Thuringian State Observatory, Germany), who raised the alarm about Alpha Cen Bb a few years ago, goes so far as to suggest in his Nature perspective article that we should instead say Proxima Cen b lies in the “temperate zone,” not the “habitable zone,” the latter of which is misleading.
It’s also unclear just how much the M dwarf’s active personality would harm the planet. Proxima Centauri b receives roughly 100 times more X-ray radiation from its star as Earth does from the Sun (that’s a revised estimate from the more conservative 400x in the paper). What that means for habitability is anyone’s guess. A lot will depend on what the star did in its early days, which astronomers don’t know: M dwarfs are much more mysterious in this regard that stars like the Sun, Reiners says. If Proxima Centauri formed with Alpha Centauri A and B — and astronomers aren’t 100% sure Proxima is in fact bound to the tighter pair — then it’s likely the same age as they are, or roughly 5 billion years, on par with the Sun.
Lastly, the planet is probably tidally locked in synchronous rotation, which means it always points the same face at Proxima, just as the Moon always points the same face at Earth. That’s not a death knell for habitability, but it does change the requirements for atmospheric circulation.
Reference: G. Anglada-Escudé et al. “A terrestrial planet candidate in a temperate orbit around Proxima Centauri.” Nature. August 24, 2016.
More illustrations and videos available with ESO's press release.
Find Alpha Centauri and other stars using S&T's Celestial Globe.
August 24, 2016 at 1:53 pm
Well , that's fascinating! Let's build the Jupiter 2 and send the Robinsons out there! Seriously, that is really something that there is a world in another star system that's as close as this.I wish we could put our efforts into exploration instead of wars. We might find cures for disease as well out there. I saw Alpha Centauri when I was in the Army stationed in Hawaii. The old show Lost In Space got me into astronomy back in the 60s when I was about 8 years old. I didn't have the math skills to be an astronomer, but I've always kept up with what's going on, as well as having a telescope around. I'm anxious to see what happens with this.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
August 31, 2016 at 8:29 pm
A rocky planet that much bigger than the earth would make it difficult to move, the gravity would be extremely uncomfortable. Also having one side of the planet facing the sun all the time would make one side rather hot and the dark side cold, would it not? So fat all the excitement about finding planets out there has made me realize how much of a miracle our planet is - so far it is unique - I am not seeing any mass migrations to other planets after ours is destroyed by our sun - our solar system is so balanced as to protect our planet (for now) from so much of the dangers out there - I do not see anything like it that astronomers have found so far.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.