A star in the constellation Norma appears to have been created when two stars merged.

bright blue pair of stars surrounded by a dumbbell-shaped cloud of gas and dust
This image, taken with the VLT Survey Telescope hosted at ESO’s Paranal Observatory, shows the beautiful nebula NGC 6164/6165, also known as the Dragon’s Egg. The nebula is a cloud of gas and dust surrounding a pair of stars called HD 148937 and lies about 3,800 light-years away.
ESO / VPHAS+ team, acknowledgement: CASU

In stellar astronomy, sometimes 1 + 1 = 1.

Astronomers haven’t lost their grip on math. The latest evidence for this calculus comes from the nebula NGC 6164/6165. At its heart lies the binary HD 148937, which comprises a pair of hot, massive O-type stars.

But not too long ago, there were likely three stars.

Reporting in the April 12th Science, Abigail Frost (KU Leuven, Belgium, and European Southern Observatory, Chile) and an international team of astronomers have found compelling evidence that the more massive star of the pair formed when two earlier stars merged.

Many stars form in binaries or higher-order multiple systems. In fact, nearly all of the most massive stars have at least one companion.

Under the right circumstances, these stars can actually spiral in and merge with each other in a violent splash. When they do, they throw off gas that cools and creates dust, temporarily shrouding the new star. This event is called a red nova (red because of the dust’s effect).

Astronomers have found a handful of examples of stellar mergers, either caught in the act or as suspicious-looking stars that have all the hallmarks of having been created in a crash.

The primary star of HD 148937 is one of the latter.

Frost’s team combined ground- and space-based data, including observations taken over a period of nine years with the Very Large Telescope Interferometer in Chile, to confirm that the system’s primary is a massive O star with a strong magnetic field.

Massive stars like these aren’t supposed to have strong surface magnetic fields, because they don’t have the same churning in their interiors that sustains magnetic fields in stars like the Sun. Yet approximately 7% of massive stars have observable fields.

A stellar merger, on the other hand, would stir up the inside of a newly created star, creating a strong magnetic field. The new star would spin abnormally fast, too, and it would look “too young” for its mass — and both of these are properties of HD 148937’s primary. More massive stars evolve faster, and stars born as binaries form together at the same time. Yet despite being heftier than its companion, the primary looks at least 1.4 million years younger.

Based on the nebula’s expansion speed, the team suggests the merger happened several thousand years ago.

Notably, about 8% of O stars are predicted to experience a merger — similar to the fraction of them found with mysterious magnetic fields.

You can read more about what happens when stars merge in Sky & Telescope’s June 2024 issue.

Tags

merger

Comments


Image of Anthony-Mallama

Anthony-Mallama

April 15, 2024 at 1:43 pm

This nebula and star can be observed from the southern hemisphere at 16:33:52 -48 07 (J2000). HD 148937 is a spectroscopic binary according the Simbad catalog. The AAVSO lists it as NSV 7808 and gives it magnitude range as 6.71 to 6.81.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

April 15, 2024 at 5:32 pm

Red nova? Don't you mean luminous red nova (LRN or LRNe) It was coined in 2015? This refers to the shell that surrounds the star it is bright in the infrared. I.e. V838 Monocerotis They are also referred as "intermediate luminosity optical transits," or ILOTs. I think this story might be a bit confusing, because the shell of the nebulae around the star isn't necessarily caused by the nova event. That is my understanding. Thanks for the article.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

April 15, 2024 at 5:34 pm

Sorry for the shouting. It should read;
Red nova? Don't you mean luminous red nova (LRN or LRNe) It was coined in 2015? This refers to the shell that surrounds the star it is bright in the infrared. I.e. V838 Monocerotis They are also referred as "intermediate luminosity optical transits," or ILOTs. I think this story might be a bit confusing, because the shell of the nebulae around the star isn't necessarily caused by the nova event. That is my understanding. Thanks for the article.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

April 15, 2024 at 7:39 pm

Comments
- The outer nebulosity is a bipolar nebula, based on the mirrored symmetry of the expanding gas shell.
- There is another image of NGC 6164-5 issued on 19/06/2006 from Gemini Observatory and imaged by Gemini South. https://gemini.edu/node/188 If you look at this image, you'll see why 'red nova' term applies. There is also an excellent amateur description there.
- NGC 6164-5 was discovered by Sir John Herschel at the Cape of Good Hope with an 18-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He recorded it as "Neb violently suspected immediately preceding a double star."
- Another example of merging stars are the R CrB variable stars, whose carbon emissions emanate by the merger, and are hydrogen deficient. However, these are typically low massed stars.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.