Peering deep into the past, the James Webb Space Telescope’s keen detectors are revealing unprecedented details of some of the oldest structures in the universe. Formerly fuzzy images become sharp at the telescope's highest resolution. One such re-examination of an energetic primordial galaxy has left many astronomers starstruck: Webb reveals the single galactic unit is actually six galaxies, crashing together to create a deluge of fresh stars.

a light colored shape with veins running through it against a background of stars
An illustration of HFLS3 when it was first perceived as a primordial maximum starburst galaxy.
ESA - C. Carreau

In 2013 astronomers using data from the Herschel Space Observatory discovered the earliest star-forming galaxy yet seen. Bursting at the seams with new stars when the universe was only about 850 million years old, the existence of the object, christened HFLS3, defied accepted scenarios for how quickly galaxies could grow. The colossal stellar factory ignited new stars at a rate about 2,000 times greater than our Milky Way, despite having roughly the same mass.

In the universe’s infancy, astronomers had believed, galaxies should not nearly be this big with such a high birth rate. Several teams attempted to image the galaxy again using the Hubble Space Telescope and several ground-based telescopes. Yet the photos only hinted at the rough signatures of other nearby sources—with the potential influence of gravitational lensing, in which massive objects closer to us warp and magnify the light rays from distant objects behind them.

Now with new data, scientists have proposed that HFLS3 is not a single giant starburst galaxy after all. “This galaxy was actually an interacting system of galaxies in the early universe,” says team lead Gareth Jones (University of Oxford), “which are still very bright and starbursting, but as a system rather than a single source.”

a graph with right ascension on the x axis and declention on the y axis
This plot of the HFLS3 environment traces star formation in the six merging galaxies.
G. C. Jones. GA-NIFS Collaboration

The new observation was part of a JWST program called Galaxy Assembly with NIRSpec Integral Field Spectroscopy. This collaboration is targeting 40 of the most distant and massive galaxies to resolve even the smallest pockets of space around them in great detail. The spectrograph’s Integral Field Unit cast its eye on HFLS3’s radiant neighborhood in September 2022.

The team led by Jones produced a set of images that displayed brightness across different wavelengths and fields of view. They then analyzed the motions and heating of the gases in the galaxy, and modeled how much gravitational lensing could have affected the perceived light. In doing so, they reconstructed a more accurate image of HFLS3.

Jones had expected to see the typical rotational movement of gas seen in similar early galaxies. “But instead of a single rotating [galaxy], we just had lots of little galaxies,” he says.

Based on the analysis, the bulk of HFLS3 is composed of three pairs of small, closely interacting galaxies. Just one of those pairs is magnified by two separate foreground galaxies. Given the incredibly dense field, scientists suggest that the sextuplet system is colliding, triggering a surge of new stars.

Follow-up observations nearly a decade ago had shown prominently bright emissions around HFLS3. This made Dominik Riechers (University of Cologne, Germany), who led the 2013 discovery at a lower resolution with Herschel, consider the possibility of neighboring mergers. However, he recognized that the telescopes available at the time did not yet have the capability to expose the true nature of those interactions.

“We speculated that these could be galaxies associated with starburst, but JWST shows this beyond any doubt by measuring precise distances and sizes of these ‘companion’ systems,” says Riechers, who was not involved in the new study.

Riechers also commends Jones and his team for verifying that we see only a weak gravitational lensing of the cluster. This proves HFLS3 is indeed massive and chock full of bright new stars, not just a smaller magnified system, he explains.

Scientists can now view HFLS3 as a chaotic jumble of galaxies entangled in webs of star formation. This reassures Kenneth Duncan (University of Edinburgh, UK), who wasn’t involved in the study, that the results actually align with current galaxy formation theories. Had HFLS3 been one gargantuan galaxy, Duncan notes, astronomers would have had to modify that framework. “With these observations confirming that it is in fact a group of galaxies undergoing a series of mergers, it supports our picture of mergers playing a critical role in the build-up of galaxies,” writes Duncan. But still, the images are striking, he remarks: “What is surprising is really just how messy and complex the system turns out to be.”

Chiara Villanueva (@chiiavilla) is a graduate student in the Science Communication M.S. Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. They have a background in astrophysics and are interested in covering stories about the universe.




Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

December 22, 2023 at 4:25 pm

Article caption says. "An illustration of HFLS3 when it was first perceived as a primordial maximum starburst galaxy. ESA - C. Carreau." with the image label saying : "Artistic-impression..." Really. How realistic is this image then? What is this image AI generated? Sure it is pretty, but I'm perplexed as to what it is trying to portray to the reader. When I read the original paper on this story, this image does not appear at all. Context is everything. Thanks.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Martian-Bachelor


December 23, 2023 at 8:15 pm

> Several teams attempted to image the galaxy again using the Hubble Space Telescope...

Because it operates at shorter wavelengths than JWST, shouldn't HST have superior angular resolution?

I also had the same question as Mr. James above. The picture looks a lot like NGC 5128 (Cen A) in the Hubble Atlas.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Lou


December 24, 2023 at 2:35 pm

According to my notes, Webb has a resolution of 20milliarcsec at 600nm and Hubble is 40milliarcsec at 500nm. If I was only interested in the optical, I would choose Hubble because of the much wider selection of filters available in the optical band.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

December 26, 2023 at 4:24 pm

Actually, I did a lot of background reading about the object. The image was created by a graphic artist from the ESA and has produced many artistic impressions of astronomical objects and spacecraft. I feel that the title "JWST Reveals Distant “Galaxy” Is Six-way Galactic Crash" is an issue here. There is no evidence there are six galaxies here. This image shows six active regions, which are assumed to be interactions of galactic collisions. None of the literature on this Galaxy mentions six galaxies interacting. What I find interesting is this is a very massive galaxy, much larger than ones we see in the universe. Current theory says that the early galaxies were formed by merges, and the importance of this galaxy system supports such a hypothesis. Perhaps the title should be instead; "JWST Reveals Distant “Galaxy” Supports Galaxy Formation Hypothesis." Just saying.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

December 26, 2023 at 4:27 pm

Actually "JWST Reveals Distant “Galaxy” : Supports Galaxy Formation Hypothesis"

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.