NASA’s Lucy mission now has a new first target of opportunity, a main-belt asteroid it will visit this November.

Lucy spacecraft next to shiny rock on black field
This illustration shows the Lucy spacecraft passing one of the Trojan Asteroids near Jupiter.
Southwest Research Institute

Add another target to Lucy’s already record-breaking list of worlds to visit. The Southwest Research Institute announced this week that NASA’s Lucy mission will make a close flyby pass near a main belt asteroid later this year. The rendezvous just outside of the orbit of Mars will give the team a chance to put the spacecraft’s asteroid-tracking navigation system to the test.

“Lucy will be the first flyby mission to employ an innovative and complex system to automatically track the asteroid during the encounter,” says Hal Levison (Southwest Research Institute) in a recent press release. “The novel terminal tracking system will allow the spacecraft to take many more images of the target.”

In the past, spacecraft had to simply point and scan the area where an asteroid was expected to be, and oftentimes a majority of pictures would simply come back blank. But with its enhanced capabilities, Lucy can instead autonomously find, track, and image the asteroid.

The Addition

The new target was discovered more than two decades ago, on November 4, 1999, by the prolific Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) survey, in operation near Socorro New Mexico. The asteroid, technically designated 1999 VD57 (152830), now has the provisional name of Dinkinesh, the Ethiopian name for the Lucy hominin fossil that the mission was named after. (The name is still awaiting approval by the International Astronomical Union.)

At 700 meters (2,000 feet) across, Dinkinesh will be the smallest main-belt asteroid seen up close. It's a stony, S-type asteroid orbits the Sun once every 3.24 years. Its size is akin to 500-meter, near-Earth asteroid Bennu, which NASA’s Osiris-Rex mission left in 2021 following a long orbital stay and sample collection.

Lucy's flyby will occur on November 1, 2023.

orbit diagram shows Lucy spiraling outward in the solar system
This diagram shows the trajectory of Lucy's flyby past the main-belt asteroid this November.
SwRI

Mission scientist Raphael Marschall (Nice Observatory, France) originally selected 500,000 asteroids with well-known orbits to see if any could be of potential interest to the mission. Dinkinesh stood out from the pack: Lucy's original path would take it within 64,000 kilometers (40,000 miles) — three times closer than it comes to any other asteroid in the belt. And it turns out that, with just a slight adjustment, Lucy can fly just 450 kilometers from the asteroid with no major impacts to future targeted flybys.

Launch photo
The launch of Lucy from Cape Canaveral
NASA / Bill Ingalls

Launched on October 16, 2021 from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station atop an Atlas V rocket, Lucy carried out an Earth flyby on October 16 2022. That maneuver helped send the mission toward the main asteroid belt and, beyond that, to the leading and trailing Trojan asteroid swarms around Jupiter in its orbit.

Lucy suffered from a stuck solar panel shortly after launch, but it's now generating enough power to continue with the mission. The current status, as assessed by NASA engineers, is that one of the twin circular panels is currently between 350 degrees and 357 degrees.

Over the next 12 years, Lucy will visit two main-belt asteroids and eight Trojans, including the moonlet 15094 Polymele discovered by professional and amateur astronomers during a stellar occultation.

Lucy's full trajectory is both spiraling and looping
Lucy will take a long, looping orbit en route to Jupiter's two Trojan asteroid camps.
SwRI

Next up, Lucy will carry out a set of course corrections in May that will put it on track for the November flyby. Next year, Lucy will again fly by Earth in December, ahead of its next planned flyby past asteroid 52246 Donaldjohanson in 2025.

Like NASA's New Horizons, and JAXA's Hayabusa 2, Lucy is showcasing our newfound capabilities to discover mission targets even after launch. This enables controllers and researchers to get the most "bang of the buck" from spacecraft already out in the solar system and available for use.


Tags

Lucy

Comments


Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

February 2, 2023 at 7:09 pm

“Lucy will be the first flyby mission to employ an innovative and complex system to automatically track the asteroid during the encounter ... .”

"Like NASA's New Horizons, and JAXA's Hayabusa 2, Lucy is showcasing our newfound capabilities to discover mission targets even after launch. This enables controllers and researchers to get the most "bang of the buck" from spacecraft already out in the solar system and available for use."

As robotic spacecraft become exponentially more flexible and capable, there is less and less justification for human spaceflight. Robots are millions of times cheaper than human missions. Robots don't get cancer from radiation, osteoporosis from microgravity, or lose their sanity millions of kilometers from Earth. You can send a robot out on a one way mission that can last for decades (hello, Voyagers), you don't have to bring it back to Earth before it runs out of life support. And if a robot suffers a failure nobody dies.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bert Van Opstal

Bert Van Opstal

February 4, 2023 at 5:03 am

I fully acknowledge your arguments for (only) robotic spaceflight.
However, I would love to witness a debate on this topic between you and Astrobiologist David Grinspoon. David would not deny your arguments, but I'm sure he would bring in also strong arguments for human missions, both short and long term. But I'll leave that to David.
Personally I'm convinced that both robotic and human spaceflight have their own merits and preferred applications.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

February 4, 2023 at 3:40 pm

Thanks Bert. Based on their relative costs, human missions need to be millions of times more worthwhile than robotic missions. I would rather send a million robots to Mars than see video of a human astronaut raising a flag there.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Bert Van Opstal

Bert Van Opstal

February 6, 2023 at 1:39 pm

Anthony, you're absolutely right! (I wouldn't dare to disagree). It's just that I think that human spaceflight (generally speaking) has the potential to dramatically raise important public support for space missions. At least, this was the tremendous result of the 'race to the moon' in the sixties ; back then, it set in motion and boosted scientific research and progress in so many fields, with numerous spinoffs in (other than space) scientific domains.
Another event that would dramatically raise public interest would off course be the discovery of (precursors of ) life on/in another world (Europa? Enceladus? Titan?...) and it's true that space missions to explore this will inevitably be robotic 😉

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

February 6, 2023 at 7:43 pm

Hi Bert. I hope I'm not being too strident. I've been encouraged by the level of public enthusiasm for robotic space missions like the Voyagers, Hubble, the Mars rovers, Cassini, and now the James Webb Space Telescope. With the right public relations team, people can love robots.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Don-Kerouac

Don-Kerouac

February 6, 2023 at 2:53 pm

Well said.
Also, while Mars is likely sterile, there is a very long chance that is has basic life. It would be crime against science to risk contaminating it with Earth biota from a few blundering humans.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.