A brilliant flash of blue light briefly outshined its host galaxy before fading away — but then it exploded again, and again.

white flare of light at left gives rise to spiral jet going off to the right
Artist's impression of the Tasmanian Devil, an explosive flare that keeps on flaring, so far more than a dozen times.
Caltech / R. Hurt (IPAC)

On September 7, 2022, an automatic telescope picked up a blazing dot of blue light some 1,000 times brighter than a typical supernova. The brilliant blue flare faded away, but not before an automated system had put astronomers on alert.

The system designated the event AT2022tsd, but it soon came to be called the “Tasmanian Devil.” It joined the short list of a special class of objects discovered in 2018 known as luminous fast blue optical transients (LFBOTs). Astronomers think these explosive flares are a special kind of supernova, but they could also be stars ripped apart in the intense gravitational field surrounding a neutron star or black hole. The devil, as they say, is in the details.

But while the Tasmanian Devil’s discovery was a welcome surprise, the real bombshell came 100 days later. In December that year, Anna Ho (Cornell University) and colleagues were reviewing routine images that had monitored the fading flare when, to their bewilderment, they found a red-colored burst almost as bright as the original blue one, and in the same position on the sky.

Scouring for more data, both in the archive and then with new observations, the astronomers found another outburst — and then another, and another. The energy of each one of these outbursts is equivalent to that released from an exploding star. Overall, at least 14 flares followed the first one, Ho and colleagues report in Nature, and it’s likely there were many more they missed.

“An event like this has never been witnessed before,” says team member Jeff Cooke (Swinburne University of Technology and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Gravitational Wave Discovery, Australia).

“Indeed, optical flares following an explosive transient like the Tasmanian Devil — with luminosity similar to supernovae, but only lasting a minute or two — are a completely new (and unexpected) discovery,” agrees Ashley Chrimes (ESA), who wasn’t involved with the study.

Image of the luminous explosion on the outskirts of a galaxy
White lines mark the position of the Tasmanian Devil (AT2022tsd) on the outskirts of a nearby galaxy. The scale bar at bottom is 5 arcseconds long, which corresponds to 68,500 light-years at the distance of the galaxy.
Keck / LRIS / Ho et al. / Nature 2023

The Zwicky Transient Facility uses the 48-inch Samuel Oschin Telescope and a CCD camera that covers a full 47 square degrees with every image to scan the entire night sky visible from the Palomar Observatory in California about every two days. Machine-learning algorithms then scour the data for new pinpricks of light that appear, disappear, or move between images.

Zwicky picked up the rapidly fading Tasmanian Devil within about an arcsecond of a galaxy 3 billion light-years away. That alignment was fortunate for astronomers, since it lends a distance to the flare that would otherwise be unknown.

Follow-up observations showed that, while the blue light faded quickly, the source also gave off bright radio and X-ray emission for weeks afterward. While the initial, blue light was likely thermal in nature, meaning that it comes from the heat of the explosion, the radio waves and X-rays, as well as the subsequent, red-colored flares, likely come not from heat but from something else. Most likely, the emission comes from speedy electrons whizzing around strong magnetic fields.

In fact, the follow-on flares brighten and fade so quickly — within minutes at the longest, and some flares are as short as 20 seconds — that whatever source they come from is correspondingly tiny. (A source can only brighten or fade as fast as light can travel across it, so quick changes indicate a smaller size.) The source of the flares is no more than 10 times the width of the Sun, Ho’s team finds.

The nature of the emission together with the small size and extreme energies suggests that the flares are coming from a jet that’s escaping the gravity of a black hole or neutron star at near-light speeds.

“The result supports theories for LFBOTs which involve a neutron star or black hole accreting mass — not just initially (causing the explosion) — but also at a lower level for many months or even years afterwards,” Chrimes says.

That still leaves a lot of possibilities for what causes LFBOTs to begin with. Ho and colleagues consider three scenarios to be likely: the collapse of a super-giant star, the merger of a massive star with a neutron star or black hole, or the white-dwarf meal of a black hole hundreds or thousands of times the Sun’s mass. All three of these scenarios could produce a speedy jet of escaping material.

“The [stellar] corpse is not just sitting there,” Ho says, “it’s active and doing things that we can detect.” The Tasmanian Devil thus provides astronomers with a new way to study these celestial explosions, and perhaps ultimately find out what is creating them.

Comments


Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

November 22, 2023 at 2:48 am

Is the jet facing directly towards us? If true, the graphic is wrong. Also is the energy discontinuous or cyclic here? I'd think the source generating this is more related to symmetry than multiple SN events. Moreover, I don't understand the “Tasmanian Devil” connotation at all. Sure they make at lot of noise when competing for food, but that is about it. Is it because the cartoon character looks like a dizzying whirlwind?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

November 28, 2023 at 6:08 pm

AT2022tsd

Don't try to read too much meaning into the nickname. The three letters tsd, too much coffee, and too little sleep easily yield tasmanian devil.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

December 14, 2023 at 3:11 am

Actually. I was totally lucid when I wrote this. The Australian astronomer who decided to name this after the Tasmanian devil was using the label to promote Australian astronomy. I'm for promoting Australian astronomy, as it is being a citizen of that country, but I find the acronym to be too narrowminded to highlight this discovery. I made the point about the use of acronyms, but the edited is here decided to delete it. Another example which is more recent, is using the term for the new rover to be selected for the moon. It is named Roo-ver. Jingoism is the enemy of science because it's important that our exploration of the universe is that, universal not parochial. The true evil at I meant is that space exploration has become based on countries not on the benefit of all mankind. Good morning world

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Andrew James

Andrew James

December 14, 2023 at 3:20 am

... we should be as scientists behave as a collective, but instead we are individualistic. and selfish as a species. Astronomy is a chance for this world do you understand how microscopic we are against the whole universe, and we should be reverent, and also protective in how we use things for the greater good. That is what I think. The be from me to contradict this belief that a hold. Your implication is unwarranted and my original intention well thought out - icaffeine or no caffeine!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Brian of DRAA

Brian of DRAA

December 5, 2023 at 11:41 am

Andrew,
The article does state: The lack of detected flares in other LFBOTs could be due to viewing angle: AT2018cow is thought to have been observed close to the plane of the circumburst “disk” rather than face-on5, 8 , and a more on-axis viewing angle for AT2022tsd could also help explain the significantly more luminous X-ray emission (Figure 2).
So you are correct, but a “down the barrel” Blazar is not required to get the x-rays to the Chandra x-ray space telescope here at earth. I think the source of light is the jet illuminating the dust and gas in the region of the object, and then the light reflects or is generated by the excitation (and subsequent fall to lower energy states) of the gas and dust. Having said that, the source of the jet that causes this is intermittent flair-up is caused by the remnants of the star that caused the initial “explosion” falling into the black hole or neutron star. The jet doesn't have to be pointed directly at the earth, just a dust/gas/stellar remnant cloud, of the cannibalised star. This accretion may explain the continued, high energy x-ray profile of the object. The article also suggests a magnetar’s magnetic field is whipping up ions to cause the subsequent "glow" in the radio and x-ray spectrum. Just my guess... The only thing that is certain is that this object is not defined yet.
I found it interesting Monica wrote this article including the description "a blazing dot of blue light some 1,000 times brighter than a typical supernova", but never used the term “kilonova” which involves a neutron star merging with another neutron star or black hole. These mergers are messy, leave a lot of mass behind and are thought to be a prime source of the heaviest elements in the universe. Perhaps JWST will have a peak at the spectrum of this object and shed some light on its composition and backstory. Hope this helps. Brian

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of StanR

StanR

November 25, 2023 at 2:33 am

It seems to me that there is a possibility, undiscussed, that the "fortunate" position alignment with the galaxy could just be coincidental. In that case, the events could be a lot closer (and weaker).

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of robin_astro

robin_astro

November 25, 2023 at 12:36 pm

That hypothesis is discussed in the paper, concluding that it is "highly likely" that the transient, the galaxy and the flares are associated.

See "Methods 3"
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10195.pdf

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of Anthony Barreiro

Anthony Barreiro

November 28, 2023 at 6:10 pm

Most of the comments that propose alternative hypotheses would be obviated if people read the original publication before posting.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.