Turns out magnetic fields — not gravity — govern the center of the Milky Way.

Magnetic field in the galactic center
A composite image of the central region of our Milky Way galaxy, known as Sagittarius A. SOFIA found that magnetic fields, shown as streamlines, are strong enough to control the material moving around the black hole, even in the presence of enormous gravitational forces.
NASA / SOFIA / L. Proudfit / ESA / Herschel / Hubble Space Telescope

What governs the dynamics of gas close to the center of our Milky Way galaxy? Gravity is the standard answer. After all, there’s a 4 million-solar-mass black hole hiding there.

But new data from NASA’s Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) reveal that strong magnetic fields may actually dominate, just like they do in the Sun’s corona. The new result may shed light on two outstanding questions about the galactic center.

Into the Galactic Center

SOFIA is a Boeing 747SP turned high-flying observatory. Its HAWC+ instrument, a far-infrared imaging polarimeter, studied the galactic center during flights in May 2017 and July 2018. Measurements of the far-infrared light’s polarization revealed the orientation of dust particles, which rotate to align perpendicular to magnetic field lines.

Charles Dowell (NASA / JPL) led a team in studying the central 15 light-years of the galactic center, deducing an average magnetic field strength of 0.005 gauss. That’s about 100 times weaker than the average magnetic field strength on Earth’s surface. But since the density in the galactic center is so low, only some 10,000 atoms per cubic centimeter, the gas’s magnetic pressure is much higher than its thermal pressure.

As a result, gravity may not be the dominant force that determines the motions of the gas. Instead, “the magnetic field may govern the kinematics and channel the plasma, just like magnetic fields dominate the physics of the solar corona,” says team member Joan Schmelz (Universities Space Research Association), who presented the preliminary results Tuesday at the virtual meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

“The data provide the most detailed look yet at the magnetic fields surrounding our galaxy’s central black hole,” says team member David Chuss (Villanova University).

Explaining Strange Black Hole Behavior

Andrew Fox (Space Telescope Science Institute), who was not involved in the study, says the results are not really surprising. “The galactic center is a very energetic region full of highly ionized plasmas,” he says, “so it makes sense that magnetic fields would dominate other sources of pressure.”

But according to Schmelz, astrophysicists generally tend to avoid including the effects of magnetic fields because they complicate the picture. “We’re now confronted with data that are so compelling that we just can’t ignore magnetic fields anymore,” she says.

If magnetic fields govern gas motions rather than just gravity, this may explain two surprising facts about the core of our Milky Way galaxy: the low birth rate of new stars (despite the presence of huge amounts of gas) and the weak activity of the galaxy’s central black hole. Strong magnetic fields could both suppress star formation and prevent matter from falling into the black hole.

Meanwhile, Schmelz cautions that calculating magnetic field strength from polarization data is not straightforward. “Our next step is to check if our standard techniques do apply in this turbulent environment,” she says. “So far, the observation of Zeeman effects in the Milky Way center [the splitting of spectral lines in the presence of strong magnetic fields] compares favorably with our results.”


Image of AJames


June 7, 2020 at 10:08 pm

Not overly convinced. Not knowing the field strength is a main worry.

Accepted theory is that strong magnetic fields are often only associated with stars and their end-life phenomena, while the role within galaxies, especially with star formation, are present but do not dominate the formation/evolutionary processes. In the inter-galactic medium (IGM) the magnetic fields are very weak or are incoherent structures so that gravitation dominates there structure and behaviours. Importantly, these effects are not at all scaleable.

The broad-brush statement above, that; "But according to Schmelz, astrophysicists generally tend to avoid including the effects of magnetic fields because they complicate the picture. “We’re now confronted with data that are so compelling that we just can’t ignore magnetic fields anymore,” she says." is frankly almost dangerous (thinking specifically of the plasma or electric universe nutters here), because these observed magnetic fields in this story only apply to extreme environments.

Lastly, I think this article underplays the sheer technological difficulties obtaining polarisation measurement data - especially towards knowing the true behaviour of static structures measured across large-size astronomical scales e.g. Say, overall field coherency with nebulae is an assumption. In the resolution with the attached figure shows this point clearly. e.g. The outline does not look like iron filings of a bar magnetic nor like the Earth's field. Likewise, applying Zeemen effects.too, has the same such technological issues.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Image of AJames


June 8, 2020 at 9:31 pm

Elaborating on my previous points (above) is this very good arXiv article that was released yesterday (8th June) by Heald, G., "Magnetism Science with the Square Kilometre Array." , e.g. On pg. 9 says; "The role of magnetic fields in forming and shaping these is not yet clear but can be resolved by determining the strength and degree of order of magnetic fields, and comparing with simulations."

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.